2
-1

[–] projection 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

That's funny considering you believe NIST on 9/11.

0
1

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

...

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

In fact there is an ever larger growing body of evidence that we may have taken some seriously wrong turns in physics, astronomy, and archeology, to name a few, as far back as 100-150 years ago. Chances are there will be an upheaval to varying degrees throughout sometime over the next twenty to fifty years.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] Artooweaboo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Any sources you'd like to share on this?

0
0

[–] flowerchild ago 

Unless the observable pattern of known history changes, in 500 years much of today's science will be seen as a rudimentary but necessary foundation.

0
0

[–] The_Cat [S] ago 

Don't equate pre-scientific beliefs with established science. To date, no established scientific theory has ever been overthrown.

0
0

[–] Duke_Nucleon ago 

As one of many famous labs that have lost the century-old, greatest race in physics to derive fundamental constants from 1st principles, one might think symmetrymagazine.org articles might focus on retooling and rethinking assumptions (e.g., continuous space-time theory on which Standard Model and General Relativity math are based), much like sports teams analyze why they lost a game (or in this case, the championship).