0
5

[–] 14099649? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

http://archive.is/hi3NL

The 3rd accuser was represented by Ford's lawyer 10 years ago in a sex harassment claim!

Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford. The company ultimately reached a financial settlement with Ms. Swetnick, the people said.

0
5

[–] 14098828? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/1045094799936761856?s=21 Says she worked for NY LIFE and sued, Katz was her lawyer.

0
6

[–] 14097710? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Good idea

0
10

[–] 14098465? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

I sure could use a Q about right now How about you?

0
2

[–] 14099454? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I’m with you there!

0
5

[–] 14098840? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I know I am jonezing for a Q fix lol.

0
2

[–] 14099426? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Same. Lol

[–] [deleted] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] 14098058? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Agreed drop it on them .they will do ut best n fastest

0
33

[–] 14097587? [S] 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

I'm a 65 yr old granny, I won't be trying to post on the chans, but would appreciate it if someone who knows what they're doing would do that.

0
0

[–] 14101075? ago 

Tits or GTFO.

0
4

[–] 14098484? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I can hardly follow what they're talking about over there, but I'm so happy they exist!!! They are such patriots, such heroes in my book!

0
22

[–] 14100709? 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Friendly anon from 4ch stopping by. This theory is pretty decent actually. I did some research for you which I'll break down here, and Ive posted it on the current main thread on Julie, I'll do the same tomorrow.

It's speculated that the source of Avenattis info was something called Suspicious Activity Reports (http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-did-michael-avenatti-get-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-bank-information-2018-5), which are stored at the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), part of the US treasury. Her current clearance (worth noting, it isn't actually as impressive as it sounds, it's ultra low level "secret" clearance) might just get her access to it, although i doubt we'll be able to confirm that. I'd regard it as not impossible anyway.

The more interesting question, to my mind, is why she'd go public now? Avenatti is already under investigation for how he got that information - for her to come public (albeit for something else) would suggest either a.) she's relatively clean b.) they're unimaginably desperate, or c.) she's already been burnt (caught) and knows it, and therefore has nothing to lose. I'm tempted to say it's a) or c), they have enough money to hire a large number of useful idiots, so b) doesn't seem likely. Her having already been caught doesn't seem utterly impossible, but I do think it's probably unlikely. So I'm tempted to think it's about 3:1 odds of being a) over c). it's still a good spot, and I'll repost it in the afternoon when americans start waking up on 4ch anyway - it'd be useful to see if I could catch someone with a better idea of how security clearances relate to the FinCEN agency.

Final point thats probably worth making - judging from her resume (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxZQeV01N5twYm1uMzBMOVY5bXc/view) various anons think she's CIA. Her various security clearances are slightly suspicious, as is her time in the "physics laboratory", as is the internet record of her photos. No way to work out if this one is true or not, but it does also match up to Avenatti having suspiciously good intel (cohen records, the tweet he posted around the time of the whidbey bay missile incident) - he seems like pureblood deep state, and if so she may well be very deeply related as well. If there's background rumblings that have been going on, she may have been flushed out into the open by some other means, which may mean the odds of c) are slightly more likely. No way to tell at the moment though sadly, unless we get any more leads on her prior internet presence.

Good theory - thank you for bringing it up.