0
0

[–] SearchVoatBot ago 

This submission was linked from this comment by @Lordbananafist.

Posted automatically (#1648) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

0
0

[–] OneOfTheBoys ago 

Careful you don't do anything you have to apologie for later.

0
0

[–] TheNerdyCowboy ago 

Variation in the bell curve of all populations. If those within a standard deviation of the mean cause problems those eho are outliers should not be punished for the crime of association. Judge every individual individually

0
0

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago 

K

0
0

[–] Lordbananafist ago 

tactically speaking, there's utility in treating a complicated enemy faction as monolithic

YOU CAN'T CHANGE STATUS OF FORCES BEFORE THE FIGHTING STARTS

YOU CAN'T PICK SURVIVORS OF A FUTURE WAR

0
0

[–] VicariousJambi [S] ago 

Oh yes, I'm not saying not to kill our enemies. I'm trying to reason out who exactly that all entails. Which ones deserve to be hung, which ones have hope yet, etc.

Scorched earth is an easy solution, but there are innocents involved, which have done nothing wrong.

0
1

[–] Lordbananafist 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

and you're going to run out there and shield the innocents?

what have you been doing for 17 years during the GWOT? Shielding afghan children?

no. you're virtue signaling. and when the metal starts flying around you aren't going to do shit. So fucking stop trying to set command parameters about an enemy that you're never going to fucking see.