0
22

[–] StormVet6 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

That was the funniest slam I have seen them air in a LONG time!!

1
6

[–] gustodog 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Somebody at CNN fucked up screening... lolololol.

0
8

[–] Paladin_Diver 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Or someone at CNN sees the writing on the wall and they are going to go into "sudden impartiality-for-the-sake-of-survivial mode"?

0
5

[–] Gigabump 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You missed the beginning where they say, “we talked to conservative voters to get their opinion on the kavanaugh matter.” Limbaugh talked about this segment for 30 minutes. The ladies had no idea each one of them was a conservative. They thought they all agreed. It was done by CNN to sow more division between parties and amp up civil war. Not what people are thinking below.

0
2

[–] praying_manic 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Good contexting. I don't watch CNN and would never have known. Your explanation makes sense. It would be even better if you gave a YouTube link to the full segment (f it exists) so people could see for themselves.

0
0

[–] 14006186? ago 

Wow. Didn't hear the beginning re: conservative voters. Just thought these were normal, sensible women! My bad!

0
0

[–] Wagonwheelz ago 

That was my first thought. It's to single out conservative women so they can be targeted. Some bomb shell will drop and CNN will be like. "See we cant trust these women." Civil war anyone?

0
16

[–] mintmachine 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Mockingbirdmedia does not have time or knowledge on how to maintain their biased narrative, when there is so much incoming truth and flak. They are like headless chickens running round. good post OP

0
9

[–] quietriot1967 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

It was nice to see them overwhelm the host, BUT, to me, the ladies contradicted themselves. They all raised their hands saying they believe BK's statement of innocence, but then they talk about it as if it happened in some form or fashion, but was no big deal. It either happened or it didn't happen. I believe it didn't happen. He said he was NOT at the party.

0
2

[–] theclarinetist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I don't see anything wrong with arguing both sides, ie, I see no evidence to believe this happened, but even if it DID happen, it's not a problem because of x, y, z.... However, it should be made clear than any arguments about any alleged event is completely hypothetical. Here it does seem that they are discussing it as though it did happen...

If we assume he will be confirmed (not assured in my mind, but for the sake of argument) and that the dems are just pushing this for #metoo talking points, it is essential from their POV that the narrative be that he DID do it and the repubs just didn't care. For this reason I agree with you that it needs to be made very clear that there is as of now no compelling evidence that this even occurred at all.

0
1

[–] Biloxigyu 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

GEEEEESH, all this about NOTHING! At 17, I would have stuck my pecker in a knothole in a tree trunk!

0
0

[–] quietriot1967 ago 

Thanks for the response, patriot.

0
8

[–] QPatriot76 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Here's a timeline: 1982 - Something may or may not have happened with another 2 (or 4) teenagers at a party, she cannot remember who threw the party, where the party was held, who she was with or how she got home. She was drinking and said nothing to anyone. 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002... She said nothing. July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit... She said nothing. 2004, 2005... She said nothing. May 11, 2006: The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recommended confirmation. Kavanaugh subsequently confirmed by the United States Senate... She said nothing. June 1, 2006: Kavanaugh sworn in by Justice Anthony Kennedy... She said nothing. 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011... She said nothing. 2012... She remembered 'something' happened in 1982, yet doesn't name Kavanaugh, still said nothing to authorities. (False Memories created at her couple's therapy session.) 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 - becomes an anti-trump activist. 2018 - now 36 years later, with Kavanaugh's SCOTUS confirmation looming, she pens an anonymous letter with grave accusations against Kavanaugh regarding foggy circumstance that occurred while they were both minors, then reveals herself and DEMANDS an FBI investigation before testifying to her incredible allegations? Who does she think she is? Sept. 19, 2018

The text message from Christine Blasey Ford this summer worried her college best friend, Catherine Piwowarski.

Over their years of friendship — as roommates, bridesmaids and parents on opposite coasts — Dr. Blasey wanted to know, had she ever confided that she had been sexually assaulted in high school?

No, Ms. Piwowarski said she texted back, she would have remembered that, and was everything O.K.? Dr. Blasey didn’t want to speak in detail quite yet, her friend recalled her responding. “I don’t know why she was asking that or what it ultimately meant or didn’t mean,” Ms. Piwowarski said in an interview, but she remembers thinking that the question betrayed deep turmoil.

That was about a month before Dr. Blasey, a research psychologist, came forward with her allegation that Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago when they were high school students in the Washington suburbs.

0
0

[–] KaylaD ago 

Excellent summary, QPatriot76

0
8

[–] cynicaloldfart 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Pretty much propaganda SOP. When a situation becomes untenable and the outcome is foreshadowed, salt the feed with results counter to expected agenda to endear viewers and have a story to point to and say "See, we're on your side, continue to watch us". RT is a prime practitioner of this, which isn't surprising as the KGB has been around for decades.

0
7

[–] othernamestaken 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Q Post # 2262

FAKE NEWS ABOUT TO SHIFT NARRATIVE AGAINST THEIR MASTERS IN EFFORT TO WEATHER THE STORM?

PANIC EVERYWHERE.

PATRIOTS ARE READY.

ENJOY THE RALLY @ THE 'Q' TONIGHT!

Q

0
3

[–] Ocean_Cruiser 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

and Q was right, they are just starting to sing a different tune.

0
7

[–] adogrocket 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

love it when a plan comes together

0
6

[–] ShiroZ 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I cant believe they aired it. Can this be part of MSM realigning?

0
1

[–] mistahbang 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nope. Not there yet. And they are not going to realign. They are going to go until the ship burns down.

0
0

[–] 13985598? ago 

I definitely think this is what is happening. Unless the interview was live and they couldn't cut out fast enough? The MSM is going to have to come to grips the they are dead if they don't change their ways, in the matter of self preservation.

load more comments ▼ (50 remaining)