0
5

[–] acmbandit01 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Have fun with it. Sign me up for any CNN panels. I say whatever needs to be said to get past their screening and then have fun with the moderator on the show!!

0
6

[–] ShiroZ 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I cant believe they aired it. Can this be part of MSM realigning?

0
0

[–] 13985598? ago 

I definitely think this is what is happening. Unless the interview was live and they couldn't cut out fast enough? The MSM is going to have to come to grips the they are dead if they don't change their ways, in the matter of self preservation.

0
1

[–] mistahbang 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nope. Not there yet. And they are not going to realign. They are going to go until the ship burns down.

0
6

[–] 16180339 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

This is CNN trying to weather the storm. Not gonna happen.

0
1

[–] Crpowell821 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agree. "Salting the feeds with results counter to expected agenda to endear viewers" implying "we're on your side" is never gonna happen, particularly with CNN. Don't forget election night, Wolfe Blitzer was so damn happy that she was winning (not) that he was dancing a jig on live feed. CNN will go down slowly, gurgling as they drown, but drown they will.

0
1

[–] Paladin_Diver 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"CNN will go down slowly"

I envision waking up some Monday morning in the Spring of 2019, turning to CNN for my daily 10-20 minute dose of brain-flagellation, and seeing nothing but the message "due to a lack of viewership, CNN will no longer be on the air......EVER!".

0
2

[–] ArbyMcPatriot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

CNN needs to be gutted or put down.

0
7

[–] othernamestaken 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Q Post # 2262

FAKE NEWS ABOUT TO SHIFT NARRATIVE AGAINST THEIR MASTERS IN EFFORT TO WEATHER THE STORM?

PANIC EVERYWHERE.

PATRIOTS ARE READY.

ENJOY THE RALLY @ THE 'Q' TONIGHT!

Q

0
3

[–] Ocean_Cruiser 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

and Q was right, they are just starting to sing a different tune.

0
7

[–] adogrocket 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

love it when a plan comes together

0
8

[–] QPatriot76 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Here's a timeline: 1982 - Something may or may not have happened with another 2 (or 4) teenagers at a party, she cannot remember who threw the party, where the party was held, who she was with or how she got home. She was drinking and said nothing to anyone. 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002... She said nothing. July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit... She said nothing. 2004, 2005... She said nothing. May 11, 2006: The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recommended confirmation. Kavanaugh subsequently confirmed by the United States Senate... She said nothing. June 1, 2006: Kavanaugh sworn in by Justice Anthony Kennedy... She said nothing. 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011... She said nothing. 2012... She remembered 'something' happened in 1982, yet doesn't name Kavanaugh, still said nothing to authorities. (False Memories created at her couple's therapy session.) 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 - becomes an anti-trump activist. 2018 - now 36 years later, with Kavanaugh's SCOTUS confirmation looming, she pens an anonymous letter with grave accusations against Kavanaugh regarding foggy circumstance that occurred while they were both minors, then reveals herself and DEMANDS an FBI investigation before testifying to her incredible allegations? Who does she think she is? Sept. 19, 2018

The text message from Christine Blasey Ford this summer worried her college best friend, Catherine Piwowarski.

Over their years of friendship — as roommates, bridesmaids and parents on opposite coasts — Dr. Blasey wanted to know, had she ever confided that she had been sexually assaulted in high school?

No, Ms. Piwowarski said she texted back, she would have remembered that, and was everything O.K.? Dr. Blasey didn’t want to speak in detail quite yet, her friend recalled her responding. “I don’t know why she was asking that or what it ultimately meant or didn’t mean,” Ms. Piwowarski said in an interview, but she remembers thinking that the question betrayed deep turmoil.

That was about a month before Dr. Blasey, a research psychologist, came forward with her allegation that Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago when they were high school students in the Washington suburbs.

0
0

[–] KaylaD ago 

Excellent summary, QPatriot76

0
8

[–] cynicaloldfart 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Pretty much propaganda SOP. When a situation becomes untenable and the outcome is foreshadowed, salt the feed with results counter to expected agenda to endear viewers and have a story to point to and say "See, we're on your side, continue to watch us". RT is a prime practitioner of this, which isn't surprising as the KGB has been around for decades.

0
9

[–] quietriot1967 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

It was nice to see them overwhelm the host, BUT, to me, the ladies contradicted themselves. They all raised their hands saying they believe BK's statement of innocence, but then they talk about it as if it happened in some form or fashion, but was no big deal. It either happened or it didn't happen. I believe it didn't happen. He said he was NOT at the party.

0
2

[–] theclarinetist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I don't see anything wrong with arguing both sides, ie, I see no evidence to believe this happened, but even if it DID happen, it's not a problem because of x, y, z.... However, it should be made clear than any arguments about any alleged event is completely hypothetical. Here it does seem that they are discussing it as though it did happen...

If we assume he will be confirmed (not assured in my mind, but for the sake of argument) and that the dems are just pushing this for #metoo talking points, it is essential from their POV that the narrative be that he DID do it and the repubs just didn't care. For this reason I agree with you that it needs to be made very clear that there is as of now no compelling evidence that this even occurred at all.

0
0

[–] quietriot1967 ago 

Thanks for the response, patriot.

0
1

[–] Biloxigyu 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

GEEEEESH, all this about NOTHING! At 17, I would have stuck my pecker in a knothole in a tree trunk!

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)