0
7

[–] Old_Man_In_A_Can 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] Old_Man_In_A_Can 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] Azurulia 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Wouldn't surprise me. The "jig is up" so they are forced to come out with it.

I cannot WAIT to see how the leftist media tries to spin this one. lol

0
2

[–] 13936582? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And wasn't it all just a ploy to gain leverage in order to negotiate against declassification? They've become so accustomed to using leverage to get their way that they've completely forgotten how to actually play by the rules, bring a valid argument, win an election on policy, etc.

edit: I know many of them never knew how to play fair, but let's give some of 'em the benefit of the doubt and pretend things were different once upon a time.

0
3

[–] Laskolurch 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

When do they pick up and jail this bitch who beared false witness? Time we start providing consequences to these asshats or it will just go on and on and on.

0
2

[–] Headwest127 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This is certainly why she has been "uncertain" of exactly when it happened. It prevents the obvious "Dude, I was in Europe that whole summer" argument. The sad part is that if this story unravels any further this chick will be left flapping in the wind by the Dem dirtbags. Feinstein will drop her like a piece of bacon on Yom Kippor.

0
2

[–] CovfefeFan 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That would be pretty awesome.

0
1

[–] SQUIRTISDELICIOUS 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The GOP needs to start kicking the shit out of these Democrats. We are at WAR!!!!!

0
0

[–] dmanny77 ago 

that's the reason she didn't name the specifics. that way, it's impossible to debunk according to their thinking. Welp, didn't work and now I hope this dies on the vine and the scheduled vote stays on track.

0
0

[–] Tmb17q ago 

But with put the exact year, month, or day How can he prove where he was. I do not believe her for a second but hard to defend a 35+old allegation

0
0

[–] docksofthebay ago 

Look, from out of the past: Tom Foley (D) House Speaker who said: "The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this." "Even though there is no evidence," he said, "the seriousness of the charge is what matters."

Thus we find Judge K... caught in the "seriousness of the charge, even though there is no evidence". Problem is that no matter what is accomplished at any hearing, the "seriousness of the charge" gives any Senator who want to vote against Judge K cover to so vote "their conscience" (if they have one). I don't believe Judge K's appointment is a done deal yet. Too much potential blackmail and now cover to vote against.

One wonders if the "Q Team" has provided any reassurance to blackmail threaten Senators.