[–] Stretchmac 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Think mirror.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] bopper 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yeah I'm a bit baffled myself.
Trying to understand what's going on...why choose these particular questions to answer and post and not the other ones like Assange etc.
I've studied the moon landings, the evidence I've seen is overwhelming that we did not go there.
100 percent confident still in Q, I'm just wondering what's up.
[–] bopper 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yeah, I believe the circumstantial and scientific evidence is overwhelming.
Strange, what really did it for me finally was the "Astronauts Gone Wild" film and their reactions when confronted about it.
That and the press conference with Neil Armstrong and the others just after the alleged landings. They were so deflated and down.
[–] BurntBizkits 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I have to agree. These are token conspiracy points.
[–] stray502 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
First of all they did go to the moon there is no actual proof otherwise. In 2008 they actually blew something up on the moon even main stream media covered it and no one paid attention. The question you should be asking is what the fuck did they blow up on the moon.
[–] SerialLarper 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You've got to think about the context.
"Programs exist that are outside of public domain."
What the public saw was Hollywood, but someone put those reflectors there.
[–] DillySquilly [S] 2 points 11 points 13 points (+13|-2) ago
Simulated reality really starting to look more plausible lol
[–] SerialLarper 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Cliff HIgh's predictive linguistics assumes that people are naturally psychic.
[–] DankOrganism 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9.pdf
Might interest you. ;)
[–] Mumbleberry 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm buying stock in popcorn, profit while watching all the heads explode.
[–] cholofrost2 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
It may be just toying with the MSM drones to see how many "omg Q is a wackjob" articles show up in the next 15 minutes.
[–] Nunyobizness 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Someone posted here that maybe the "chain" that Q uses was different.
[–] Arckz 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
Q&A open - boards flooded.
Odd Indeed - always pictured how disclosure would end up; didn't think like this - [not saying either way just odd]
[–] DillySquilly [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeah, I know. Sorry, I should have been more clear in my post...I'm just trying to wrap my head around the answers Q is giving right now, something just seems off..Why go down that road now with the declass, etc going on. The timing just seems so strange to me, not to mention the questionable answers he's giving.
[–] QPilledLib 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Q promised us two more movies. It is Q's style to slowly introduce new info. We anions are the tip of the spear for making the public aware of movie 1. It only makes sense to drop clues about movies 2 and 3.