[–] cholofrost2 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
It may be just toying with the MSM drones to see how many "omg Q is a wackjob" articles show up in the next 15 minutes.
[–] Mumbleberry 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm buying stock in popcorn, profit while watching all the heads explode.
[–] SerialLarper 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Cliff HIgh's predictive linguistics assumes that people are naturally psychic.
[–] DankOrganism 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9.pdf
Might interest you. ;)
[–] DillySquilly [S] 2 points 11 points 13 points (+13|-2) ago
Simulated reality really starting to look more plausible lol
[–] bopper 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yeah I'm a bit baffled myself.
Trying to understand what's going on...why choose these particular questions to answer and post and not the other ones like Assange etc.
I've studied the moon landings, the evidence I've seen is overwhelming that we did not go there.
100 percent confident still in Q, I'm just wondering what's up.
[–] crownedfive 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
highest security level longtime airforce worker (satellites/rocket science) straight up told me that we never went to the moon. he said we have been to space but no humans have ever been to space.
[–] Mageant 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
The evidence of the Moon landings being faked was purposely created to mislead conspiracy theorists into thinking it was fake. This way they can paint conspiracy theorists as crazy. That's why the MSM brings this up again and again, instead of 9/11, for example, which has really good evidence.
It's the same thing as with the Flat Earth conspiracy though a lot more rational, because it's quite plausible that the Moon landings could have been faked.
If you think William Tompkins is a credible insider/whistleblower, he confirms that the Moon landings really happened, and they actually met ETs there.
[–] VOALTRON 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Claim: Moon shadows are at wrong angles!
Answer: Moon has no atmosphere, sunlight is not refracted through the air like it is here on Earth.
Meaning: The first person who published this hoax is an idiot.
Besides, they found the landing site a few years ago, and there are pics of it. You can even see the tire tracks from the rover still in the lunar dust. Modern technology, and high powered cameras have debunked the hoax.
[–] AHistoryOfBadMen 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
Let's not all forget that Q has been telling us disinformation is necessary since the beginning. There is a reason he chose these particular set of questions. Major conspiracy theories dispelled. How does he appear to the new reader at this time? Optics are important.
[–] Kellygirl13 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Eases my mind ... I hope you are right. 🙂
[–] AHistoryOfBadMen ago
If he confirmed the truthfulness of today's drops down the road from now I'd say it's the truth though.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
[–] Stretchmac 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Think mirror.
[–] DillySquilly [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeah, I know. Sorry, I should have been more clear in my post...I'm just trying to wrap my head around the answers Q is giving right now, something just seems off..Why go down that road now with the declass, etc going on. The timing just seems so strange to me, not to mention the questionable answers he's giving.
[–] QPilledLib 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Q promised us two more movies. It is Q's style to slowly introduce new info. We anions are the tip of the spear for making the public aware of movie 1. It only makes sense to drop clues about movies 2 and 3.
[–] Nunyobizness 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Someone posted here that maybe the "chain" that Q uses was different.
[–] Arckz 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
you mean his tripcode? that hasn't changed in weeks.