[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
[–] WaffleManSocial [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This I think is a solid interpretation candidate...
[–] staticx106 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If I remember correctly the general consensus on what hit the pentagon was a drone with a payload. The engine that they showed in after pics matched those that are used in military predator drones at the time. They only recovered one engine and those drones only have one engine. That's my take anyway.
[–] WaffleManSocial [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Definitely a plausible “plane” but not a passenger plane.
[–] Stretchmac 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
False, the moon landings were real. Mirror The moon landings were real, false.
[–] DillySquilly 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Honestly, this would make more sense... I'm stumped atm.
[–] Strawboss 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
A cruise middle could be technically a “plane”.
[–] GranimalSnake ago
I'm thinking more along our secret Space Force lines.