[–] Anson [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
lol, good. alopix is a faggot and the world needs to see this.
If you care, I'll give you a little insight into what he's thinking right now, and you can go materialize this as soon as you see him making moves like I stated in the OP.
Alopix has been overwhelmed with the info I've posted here, some of it has a small amount of untruth added to it, but only to make him defend himself to dispel the lie, thereby confirming the truthful parts, which are very embarrassing for him. To put it simply, he's buried in social debt. What's happening now is that he has sat at an impasse for so long that he thinks he can just blow past it, as if his mind has tricked him into thinking "it all wasn't real, there's not a huge log on the internet of your most embarrassing real life doings and personality traits". Either way though, he's outside his own mind right now and vulnerable, hence the bold moves he's making lately with some pretty amusing confusion.
If you wish to screw with him, be creative. That's what I do, and he never gets a bead on me. It can be funny to watch him try and prepare an argument and he exposes that he has no idea what just happened, and he has a way of doing it in a funny way that no one else can pull off. He has ~something~ twisted up in his mind that makes this all possible, and he possesses the ability (or should I say disability xD lol) to unintentionally supply an INFINITE supply of laughs when he reacts to things.
Right now though, something to watch is his comments. Let's see if they change tone.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] Anson [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If you read the posts here I directly call you out asking you to explain how your ideology differs from full blown communism.
You have preached each and every point to the communist manifesto, which are the same as those to marxism.
You seemed to think you'd get out of the one where you're supposed to work I think though, since it takes a miracle for you to do anything; which has happened only once (which is still a mind blower).
I have recorded conversations of both you saying you dislike blacks' physical appearance and they way they act (the content of their character), but you don't dislike blacks. Then when confronted with liking or disliking them you claim to be all in on the opposite stance. You lack integrity. Let's not even get into when you do and don't think you're being watched.
Cringe atheist vs. feminist for the past decade until people came online explaining the cringe, then you pretend that wasn't you at all. Too late.
Again, this isn't your stance according to you. You say you're ok with people acting insane as long as they don't force you to fornicate with them. And you didn't even question the whole thing in THAT fashion until I mentioned mental illness, and you fought me on that point. You're a day late and a dollar short, which introduces massive doubt into anything you say to the contrary since you gave points only to the other side.
The only awareness you have of this that I've noticed is using it to your own advantage and otherwise silence to the use of it elsewhere; I figured you were aware and simply approved of it being used as it was (and if this isn't the case then you were oblivious to its usage until I mentioned it, however your long silence after me having mentioned it beings me back to the original point of you approving of its current MSM usage on the masses; i.e. raging socialism/communism from your strongly preferred presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (who has wrinkly jew balls). You seemed to have a highly uncharacteristic silence towards police action towards anything that was declared to be in favor of Sanders' or, by proxy, Hillary's cause. So your stance on social engineering appeared to consist of, at best, confused ill-intended notions.
Which made it clear you were favoring the authoritarian police state that was to be commanded by the ( basically) next dictator of the USA; and I don't believe for one minute that you Jew Sanders people didn't think of him as a dictator to-be, I heard too many of your people go off about it, and how they thought Trump would be a dictator. Well, if there was no potential for Sanders to become a dictator then how is there one for Trump? Don't get me wrong, I think fascism is good at times that call for centralization of power, such as the 2016 presidency, but you nor anyone else declared this stance and anything declared after this will be null and void as well as interpreted as nothing more than a blind projection forward of progressive notions. I'm not saying the police state should be implemented though, so maybe re-read the paragraph if you once again missed the absence of this things that make this true; you know, the proverbial "null" situation.
I'm tired of typing. Gonna stop now and do something productive.
[–] MadWorld ago
Context: