[–] AbjectDynamite 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Incredible work, SB2! I'm getting excited!!
[–] Deqlassified 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Shut the fuck up, serial delusion 2
[–] numberonepal 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Deqlassified is a bone fide troll. Ignore.
[–] CaptnObvius 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
For those people that think gematria is a load lf bunk, I agree, but......consider this. I'm beginnning to think SB2's use of gematria is just subterfuge, its used for the purpose of pushing the message that Q wants us to hear by hiding direct communication under the cover of gematria. Plausible deniability since we know Q drops on 8chan are the only comm. By who? From who? Is SB2 connected to Q somehow, or another inside source? SB2 is always accurate in his assessment, so I can look past the gematria gibberish.
[–] Brilliant-Hope-91 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
I think your post has a lot of validity and i have been thinking along the same lines. Thank you for posting!
[–] CaptnObvius 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking it. BTW, I'm not trying to out SB2, I'm appreciative of the information that he/she provides us.
[–] whacko_jacko 2 points 9 points 11 points (+11|-2) ago
/u/SerialBrain2
With all due respect for your past contributions to this community and all related communities, I cannot and WILL not endorse your recent efforts.
You have contributed in ways which leave us forever in your debt. You have been validated by Q once upon a time. You helped us navigate the Corsi fiasco. However, I do NOT stand with you in your recent endeavors. I hope that others in this community will join me in rejecting the style of decoding which you have adopted.
I will not address your illogical claims from this post one at a time. I disagree with all of them. I am not violating the rules. I am discussing the topic at hand, which is your decoding. I have no quarrel with you as a person or as a user.
What you are describing is not reasonable. What you are doing has every hallmark of a charlatan.
I can start with any premise I want and find a way to reach any conclusion whatsoever using reasoning similar to your own. Let's begin with the premise "Julian Assange". I want to reach the following keywords: "23 organizations", "13 angry Democrats", and "Q".
The following is satirical. I do not intend offense. I am creating a parody of your methods, which are relevant to the topic of this post. I do not mean to attack you personally. If you interpret the following as a personal attack, then I humbly suggest that you grow thicker skin.
Let's begin:
Okay. I'm done. I have no intention to hurt your feelings. I care very deeply for this community and the movement it represents. I do not carry any foul intentions towards you as a person. However, I strongly believe that you have become a detriment to the Great Awakening.
We need newcomers. We need regular people to come online and find out what they have been missing. What you have posted recently is absolutely nonsensical. Your decoding scheme is not logical. Your followers do no think for themselves. This is not what Q is asking us to do.
If I tell my friend about the Great Awakening, who then comes here to find out more information, I hope he or she does not encounter your posts. I want my friend to come back. I want my friend to take us seriously. You cannot be taken seriously. I will not bog myself down and waste my time analyzing why this is the case one sentence at a time.
Think for yourself.
If you, a real human person, are reading this comment, I ask you to think for yourself. Read the post above. Does any of it make sense? DAOIMS? That was the acronym of my previous sentence, after all. Did you know DAOIMS = 61 in Gematria? Look at Q1747. It was posted at 3: 16 :21. And of course, don't forget John 3:16. THINK MIRROR. Coincidence?
Think for yourself. Use logic
Look, I am not saying you are a shill (Gematria = 61), but I do believe your decoding is absent (Gematria = 61) logic. I know the pain is coming (Gematria = 61), but I must reject (Gematria = 61) your method. Even a humble (Gematria = 61) farmer (Gematria = 61) or a gay man (Gematria = 61) can see that you are not making logical deductions. Even if CIA Director Gina Haspel (Gematria = 61) were reading this on a Cessna (Gematria = 61) during a flight to Brasil (Gematria = 61) while listening to Hansen (Gematria = 61), she would pray to Jehova (Gematria = 61) that you would realize that your decoding is not legitimate. I'm with you in the fight against Google (Gematria = 61) and the rest of the man (Gematria = 61), but your recent posts have begun to lead us astray. I'm just a simple Yankee (Gematria = 61), but I care about what people think when they visit this community.
Now, how many words did I find in the previous paragraph with Gematria = 61? That's right, you're catching on now. It was precisely 15, which is one less than 16. THINK MIRROR. But, hang on. I forgot about the most important one: Q Anon. So, there we have it: 17 = Q. BOOM
But wait, there's more!
Did you see it? Did you catch the mistakes? Did you notice the misspellings?
Brasil. Hansen.
No, that's not right. I wanted Brazil and Hanson.
How far off are we?
z - s = 7
o - e = 10
7 + 10 = 17
Confirmed. Resolved.
Until next time, Patriots.
TL;DR: Please go back to using logic SB2.
[–] hfkmfn ago
The use of a mostly consistant system helps... That 9/11 post last week was not the norm among the better decodes. You wouldn't expect anybody to get everything right, every single time though.
Somehow I didn't see this Voat post for 3 days, haven't been paying attention! Thought that somehow SpaceShot76 noticed the EO # added up to 17 lol. Ought to be watching closer... I will still be wary but pleased with SB2's analysis this time.
[–] ldracc ago
TBH your opinion doesn't mean anything to me. SB2 has proved himself over and over. you, are likely a shill. but have fun and God Bless!
[–] inspiretk 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Your satirical example is already debunked. Why I say this? Where did you get the Q confirmation of JA = Just Awesome? Do you see why your logic is off? SerialBrain2's logic is all there. He doesn't make assumption like you did with Just Awesome. There's meaning in everything...do you understand now?
[–] whacko_jacko ago (edited ago)
Hahaha oh boy, you have some fun times ahead reading the old SB2 archive. The most hilarious moment ever:
"Turned off the lights" -> TOL -> Thinking of Laughing
Then SB2 "confirmed" his analysis of the hidden message based on the fact that Trump looked like he was "thinking of laughing" when he said "turned off the lights".
Shit like that is what inspired my JA = Just Awesome joke. Sorry, but the "logic" in my post was only slightly less ridiculous than SB2. He is a scam artist riding off Q.
[–] spaceace66 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
I don't know what to say Jack. If you think what you wrote is anywhere near to SB2, you need to go fuck yourself. I honestly read your entire post and it's so very clear the concepts and patterns and design are not obvious to you. Keep reading and plugging away. The concepts may take work so don't give up.