1
5

[–] spaceace66 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

I don't know what to say Jack. If you think what you wrote is anywhere near to SB2, you need to go fuck yourself. I honestly read your entire post and it's so very clear the concepts and patterns and design are not obvious to you. Keep reading and plugging away. The concepts may take work so don't give up.

0
2

[–] inspiretk 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Your satirical example is already debunked. Why I say this? Where did you get the Q confirmation of JA = Just Awesome? Do you see why your logic is off? SerialBrain2's logic is all there. He doesn't make assumption like you did with Just Awesome. There's meaning in everything...do you understand now?

0
0

[–] whacko_jacko ago  (edited ago)

Hahaha oh boy, you have some fun times ahead reading the old SB2 archive. The most hilarious moment ever:

"Turned off the lights" -> TOL -> Thinking of Laughing

Then SB2 "confirmed" his analysis of the hidden message based on the fact that Trump looked like he was "thinking of laughing" when he said "turned off the lights".

Shit like that is what inspired my JA = Just Awesome joke. Sorry, but the "logic" in my post was only slightly less ridiculous than SB2. He is a scam artist riding off Q.

0
1

[–] inspiretk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The context of Trump in the White House when the lights was off, when Trump said was showing the fact he's back in control, and knows what the Deep State was doing. Also, SerialBrain2 has proven his analysis is correct. Future now, has proven the past many times over. Too bad all his post has been deleted, or we could go back in history and bring some of his proof up. You must understand, we are all here to dig dig dig and find how to prove Q's post - future proves past. SerialBrain2 is posting, it's HIS interpretations. I read his posts, and I also use the SAME logical analysis of how I analysed your post. I respect you for posting your ideas, but I don't respect that you say SerialBrain2 is a scam artist riding off Q. SerialBrain2 used the SAME teaching of Q, and analysed Alex Jones newsletter title where he misspelled some letters. And that decode was to tell his people to drop the Corsi narrative because Corsi has been found out to be a fake. This was the SAME analysis that SerialBrain2 used, to decode Q's post. Q is TEACHING everybody on how to decode. Q's teaching everybody how this Deep State Cabal communicate with each other. The evidence is A LOT. These Deep State talk to each other with the communications that Q's teaching us. Misspelling matters. Gematria matters. Timestamp matters. The list goes on and on. The Evidence is VERY STRONG. You don't have to believe, but you don't have to tell people not to believe. You get to do your own work. You can post your own decodes! I will listen to you, and will analyse accordingly.

0
0

[–] ldracc ago 

TBH your opinion doesn't mean anything to me. SB2 has proved himself over and over. you, are likely a shill. but have fun and God Bless!

0
0

[–] hfkmfn ago 

The use of a mostly consistant system helps... That 9/11 post last week was not the norm among the better decodes. You wouldn't expect anybody to get everything right, every single time though.

Somehow I didn't see this Voat post for 3 days, haven't been paying attention! Thought that somehow SpaceShot76 noticed the EO # added up to 17 lol. Ought to be watching closer... I will still be wary but pleased with SB2's analysis this time.