[–]DukeofAnarchy0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Is it just or reasonable, that most voices against the main end of government should enslave the less number that would be free?
More just it is, doubtless, if it come to force, that a less number compel a greater to retain, which can be no wrong to them, their liberty, than that a greater number, for the pleasure of their baseness, compel a less most injuriously to be their fellow slaves.
They who seek nothing but their own just liberty, have always right to win it and to keep it, whenever they have power, be the voices never so numerous that oppose it.
LMFAO. I don't even know where to start.... You defend Marxism and call me a kike in the same breath. If I had to go out on a limb, I'd say you don't do a lot of your own thinking do ya buddy?
Almost, but not quite. He got like 30% of the vote, was practically tied with the runner up and congress gave him the presidency by decree. The law at the time did allow for this, that is true, but the decision was taken behind closed doors.
[–] Drain0 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Sounds so horrible when you don't have all the facts...
Salvador Allende - "known as the first Marxist to become president of a Latin American country through open elections."
[–] [deleted] 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
[–] DukeofAnarchy ago (edited ago)
-- John Milton
[–] Drain0 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
LMFAO. I don't even know where to start.... You defend Marxism and call me a kike in the same breath. If I had to go out on a limb, I'd say you don't do a lot of your own thinking do ya buddy?
[–] CanIHazPhD 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Almost, but not quite. He got like 30% of the vote, was practically tied with the runner up and congress gave him the presidency by decree. The law at the time did allow for this, that is true, but the decision was taken behind closed doors.