1
0

[–] 475677 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

This is why corporations need limitations. I know, I know, government ruins everything and needs to fuck off, but imagine for a second if a company could only make 10% profit per year with an upper limit on the maximum amount they could profit too, lets say a billion dollars. Any company that makes a billion dollars a year in profit would either shut shop for the remainder of the year or if they decided to be decent and keep people on for the entire year would decide that raising wages, reinvesting in their business, doing R&D, etc. would be preferable to paying 100% of their remaining profits to the government. All you need to do then is place a hard limit on the maximum difference in wage the CEOs can earn over their bottom earners of say 25:1 and it's almost assured that they'd prefer to hire locals instead of slaves, they'd make their products of a better quality, etc.

Hitler had a similar idea as he saw the corruption unlimited capitalism causes. It's not like it's ideal but it seems like a necessary evil in today's world.

0
0

[–] 1Iron_Curtain ago 

Yes, right, corporations need to be reeled in, and reeling in the corporations means reeling in the international bank cartels and also ensuring the central bank is not too controlled by the government, but only controlled enough where you don't see these International banks rising up.

What you need to do is ensure that the agriculturalists, industrialists, and commercial agents are made up of the people. This is where the people would exert the greatest strength to be honest and corporations need to funnel their economic activities and self-sufficiency, rather then dictating the whole situation. It should be top down and Hitler did not even try this approach to a considerable approach, although the Prussians did have a system like that and allowed for corporations to be weak enough, where they could invest and hold some limited power over the government. Its called Camerialism.

There need not be too sharp of divisions between corporations and the government, but let the divisions be more laissez-faire in their nature.