[–] Kill-Commies ago
So all someone has to do is make a 1 million dollar donation and then he can own 99% of the content you see here by posting with a ton of bots. I'd rather just go watch commercials at that point because anybody who is going to pay to post, is going to post advertisements or revenue generating content, and expect a return on investment.
[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] ago (edited ago)
This is why part #3 of my post comes in. $5 of each members monthly dues must go to a good cause. A good cause being helping out people who were fucked by Jews or niggers. If the kikes want to literally give money to help out people like that poor innocent man who called that nigger a nigger after attacking his wife, then why would we want to stop them?
Also, according your theory, they could do the exact same thing right now for nothing.
[–] R34p_Th3_Wh0r1w1nd ago (edited ago)
Not a bad idea. Not great either. The problem lays in the pay to use part. Sounds like something a jew would come up with.
It could be a voluntary thing. But to force payment on the user base is stupid, it would kill the site. Which is exactly what the JIDF is hoping for.
[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] ago
I made an alternate suggestion at the bottom of my ramblings. We simply tag paying members so we know who each other are. The other part that still seems important is that all the money doesn't go to Voat directly, some MUST go to good causes like helping people out whose rights are being trampled on. The problem with just giving straight money would be that whoever runs this place could simply sell out once it starts making money. If part of the money is guaranteed to help out people being cucked by niggers or Jews, then no Jew would touch the site. If a Jew did, the first thing they would do is eliminate these donations, of course, that's when we'd all cancel our memberships.
[–] TheBookWasBetter ago
Why the fuck are you trying to spend my money. Go. Fuck. Yo. Self.
[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] ago (edited ago)
Only niggers don't contribute to the greater good and only think of themselves. That's why their societies/neighborhoods are shitholes.
[–] Skankhunt1 ago
All in all this is a good idea. Love the part where shills would finance something theyre fighting against. A lot of people lurk, so it would not deter them. However, there are probably some cheap fucks who would jump ship... But they would ultimately come back once everything is censored. Speaking of censorship: the money could be used to ensure the survival.
The problem though is, that most users are from US -> therefore the content itself is heavily US biased and therefore you would only 'help' or support americans. With the additional paywall then I would wager that you would lose all non-US users.
[–] obvious-throwaway- [S] ago
Like I pointed out in my later ramblings. It could be as simple as a blue checkmark (kek) next to our names showing that we are paying members. We could even add it to upvoats and downvoats. How many paid people upvoated or downvoated something vs how many without.