0
1

[–] thelma 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Scientific method? Ain't got time for that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1
5

[–] Elbower_of_Quants 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

In the age of prophets, feminism, Lenin, Mao, diversity, and imposed correctness you will never achieve unvarnished freedom to explore truth to its nether regions.

Science dies on the winds of discontent and manufactured hatred- though shards of science squeak through the violence of each age through the fucking sheerness of its luck and the heavy friction of its persistence.

0
1

[–] boekanier 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

99% fake 'science'

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] 13544918? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I guess it's your definition of "Scientific Journal" that could cause it to be this low. In real journals, no way. The question is do we include whatever shit gender studies and lesbian dance theory journals that are out there.

0
2

[–] 13544903? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I doubt it's low unless it's because SJW nonsense papers don't really have to peer revue anything. Mathematical and the hard sciences usually have to provide some foundation for their claims. There are a lot of garbage journals I guess. Still.