0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://archive.fo/V1Fs6 :

Intel Core i9-9900K benchmarks show it easily outperforming Ryzen 7 2700X and i7-8700K - TechSpot

'Alternatively, it might not actually be a Core i9-9900K, so a slight dose of salt could be in order. '

' German site Goldem.de, meanwhile, claims that both the Core i9-9900K and Core i7-9700K will be using a soldered IHS, with the rest of the chips featuring a TIM solution. '

'Last week brought more news regarding the 9th-gen Intel chips. '

'While the database entry lists the processor as “not being recognized,” the specs suggest this is the Core i9-9900K: 8 cores, 16 threads, and a Turbo clock of 5GHz. '

'It’s also expected to come with16 MB of L3 cache, a TDP of 95W, and an Intel UHD 620 graphics chip. '


This has been an automated message.

0
3

[–] thelma 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

But how about v. my 8088 ?

Yeah, they won't publish that data.

0
0

[–] MadWorld ago 

XD Try i4004.

0
4

[–] Kr3mlin 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Um, so clock for clock it's 5 percent faster. That's hardly "way ahead". Of course you can't possibly run Ryzen at 5GHz on a regular basis - which makes the whole comparison not only greatly exaggerated on one hand, but just plain rididiculus on the other. It's not like anyone expected performance parity - I doubt we'll get an i9 in a price similiar to a R7 2700, though.

0
6

[–] AnthraxAlex 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Too slow Intel. Just built a system based on the 2700x.

0
9

[–] dontforgetaboutevil 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Fuck intel and their fucking management engine.

0
3

[–] TC10284 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

AMD has their own version too. Not being a fanboy for either side. Just saying...

0
3

[–] 13413723? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

x86 in general is just a clusterfuck of backdoors.