Because I don't see the issue from your view, I'm naive. Okay. If you're going to make a statement like that back it up with why you think I'm naive or it doesn't mean shit.
I said I was okay with it as long as the money is used to fund prison costs, I never said I believed it would actually be used for that. Hint: I don't. I know it won't cut down on crime, but it might make parents try raising their shit disasters better. Notice I said might, not that it will, I have no hope of that. You assume a lot from a few statements, to me, that is naive.
[–] Lobotomy 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Okay, you are naive to think that a government-subsidized industry would EVER correctly appropriate funds.
You are naive to think that punishing a person's family for the crimes of an individual is going to cut down on crime.
You are naive.
Happy? Well, I don't care if you are or not.
[–] NakedWarrior 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I said I was okay with it as long as the money is used to fund prison costs, I never said I believed it would actually be used for that. Hint: I don't. I know it won't cut down on crime, but it might make parents try raising their shit disasters better. Notice I said might, not that it will, I have no hope of that. You assume a lot from a few statements, to me, that is naive.