[–] dooob 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Idk if anyone posted the notable of an anon doing calculations of how many could be arrested in the sealed indictments. He used a few unsealed indictments as examples and came up with a number of over 200,000 arrests. A single sealed indictment can contain more than 100 arrests. The anon post goes into details of how he came up with the number. It will be glorious :)
[–] toutedesuite 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
RICO is my name and rolling up corruption is my game. This word is going to blow out the Twatter meter once it gets trending. It will be the word of the day, month, year, decade, era. Glorious indeed. #MAGA
[–] BigFatDaddy 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Great thread. I didn't watch the hearings, but holy shit. That dumb motherfucker Strozk really admitted Hillary has SAP material on her server?
Can anyone say, Military Tribunals?
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
I'm still "strozk" by the fact that he failed his polygraph (out of scope) and he was still allowed access to SCI material. Much less that he had access to classified the day preceding the trial, after being escorted out of FBI/HQ a month earlier.
Where did he access it? To me, it sounds like his clearance wasn't issued by the FBI...