[–] Bigwhistle 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Attorney General should order Viginia or Maryland US Attorney to investigate and convict these scumbags, and blow Debbie Wasserman Schultz into the spotlight, so she can get some serious jail time.
[–] 13213018? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
blah blah blah. This fucking scumbag and his wife are going to walk, give a deal that will be closed to public scrutiny and the people that he so called 'names' will never be brought to a public court. all of this will happen and you fucking idiots will keep thinking that trump is doing anything but allowing the very people who committed treason on this country to walk and replacing them with the other side of the aisle.
good job making israel great again you fucking idiots
[–] TH0UGHTP0LICE 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Look goy, the chosen sons of Abraham are not bound by your Earhtly laws. Those are for you dirty GOYIM.
Have you forgotten the 600 gorillion brazillion lampshades? That's hate speech!
[–] Korinthian 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
He needs to be placed under extremely high security witness protection. God knows how many gunmen hillary is going to send after him.
[–] Commie_Meta 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
IIRC the deal also excludes violent offenses.
[–] kestrel9 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
A plea deal reached by former House IT aide Imran Awan is only limited to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, details of the agreement reveal.
As part of the deal reached on July 3, Awan pleaded guilty to one charge of bank fraud. In exchange, prosecutors agreed to not file additional charges against him. Charges against his wife, Hina Alvi Awan, were also dropped.
The terms of the deal, however, stipulate that it does “not bind the Civil Division of this Office or any other United States Attorney’s Office, nor does it bind any other state, local, or federal prosecutor.”
“It also does not bar or compromise any civil, tax, or administrative claim pending or that may be made against your client,” it states.