[–] SrBearLordofOldCastl 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Dude I dont think shes calling back.
[–] JungleBoogieMonster 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
“Everyone who has been questioned says he looks very professional; he wears the uniform well,” the source said. “ This is not some creepy looking pervert. He’s entirely normal looking.”
Why was this even said? Stereotypical looks should not be part of an investigation.
[–] conundrumbombs ago
This was my immediate response to the article, as well. It's like they interviewed one of the cast members from 12 Angry Men.
[–] A_Guy_Named_Guy 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
"Splashed semen" or "ejaculated on"?
That's a creepy ass thing to do either way.
[–] bleatingnonsense ago
The substance was confirmed to be semen, but they dont know for sure it was his yet. If its his he ejaculated. If its not his, he splashed it, given at that point he's the one that really did it.
[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So, how did he get his hands on someone elses sperm, if its not his?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] A_Guy_Named_Guy 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The article didn't make it clear. Strange way to write an article I think.
Even the word "splashed" is strange. How much semen was that guy toting around?
[–] ItIsWhatItIsBabe ago
Splashing? That must have been a rather large puddle.