[–] CrudOMatic 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
When Obama did it, it was OK. When Trump renewed it, and added a few countries, all the sudden it was the diktat of der fuhrer.
[–] faggotfaggotfaggot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Trump is continuing a pre-existing law that was originally implemented by obamer. I don't see libtards bitchin when Obama separated families or banned Muslims... Edit spelling
[–] logos_ethos 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
some judges and legal analysts argued that campaign promises should be off-limits, or at least dwarfed by government actions that are not overtly discriminatory.
Correct. If the court is allowed to use rhetoric to interfere with dialectic, then we will have a very dysfunctional government.
[–] 2cents4free ago
Sotamoyer makes a valid point yet it seems they recalibrated appropriately.
[–] 2cents4free 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Quote: Katyal said. "The travel ban is atrocious policy and makes us less safe and undermines our American ideals." What a curious statement.... care to backup how banning travel from these countries leads to increased violence?
[–] uvulectomy 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Easy: Ctrl-Left Regressives don't get their way (letting in hordes of fighting-age, un-vetted, third-world savages), so they start rioting and threatening anyone to the right of Chairman Mao with violence for daring to have an opinion that doesn't align with the hive mind.