0
6

[–] liftwizard 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

How about an ACTUAL muslim ban?

0
6

[–] 2cents4free 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Quote: Katyal said. "The travel ban is atrocious policy and makes us less safe and undermines our American ideals." What a curious statement.... care to backup how banning travel from these countries leads to increased violence?

0
3

[–] uvulectomy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Easy: Ctrl-Left Regressives don't get their way (letting in hordes of fighting-age, un-vetted, third-world savages), so they start rioting and threatening anyone to the right of Chairman Mao with violence for daring to have an opinion that doesn't align with the hive mind.

0
4

[–] Derjuden 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

What kind of Muslim ban includes North Korea, yet excludes Saudi Arabia?

0
3

[–] Arrvee 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

What's shocking is that there were four votes against it. It was a very reasonable restriction that should not have received the kind of opposition that it did.

0
1

[–] CrudOMatic 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

When Obama did it, it was OK. When Trump renewed it, and added a few countries, all the sudden it was the diktat of der fuhrer.

1
0

[–] derram 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

https://archive.fo/MGWXF :

Supreme Court upholds President Donald Trump's immigration travel ban

'Digital privacy: Supreme Court cracks down on government snooping through cellphone location recordsInternet shopping: Supreme Court allows states to collect sales taxes on more online transactionsPartisan gerrymandering: Supreme Court punts on two cases regarding partisan election districts', "WASHINGTON -- A deeply divided Supreme Court upheld President Trump's immigration travel ban against predominantly Muslim countries Tuesday as a legitimate exercise of executive branch authority."

'Trump issued a simple, seven-word tweet shortly after the ruling was announced: "SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN. Wow!"'

'Now that the court has upheld it, it is up to Congress to do its job and reverse President Trump’s unilateral and unwise travel ban."', "Indeed, most of the judges who issued rulings on Trump's travel ban said his statements as a candidate, president-elect and president were relevant."


This has been an automated message.

0
0

[–] Justus14 ago 

Shabos goy and their (((masters))) protest Sessions in LA over President Trumps immigration policy.

“The rabbis, pastors and other faith leaders were among a group of about 150 demonstrators gathered outside the federal courthouse on Spring Street who were targeting Sessions because of his role in defending President Trump’s “zero tolerance” border policy”

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-sessions-downtown-20180626-story.html

0
2

[–] Eualos 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Duh

0
2

[–] prairie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Only what, a year delayed? I'm sad.

0
0

[–] CrudOMatic ago 

I predict that when Democrats get power again, they're going to try to ban travel/immigration/refugees from Europe & Russia just to spite us... of course conveniently missing the whole TERRORISM point entirely.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)