[–] logos_ethos 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
some judges and legal analysts argued that campaign promises should be off-limits, or at least dwarfed by government actions that are not overtly discriminatory.
Correct. If the court is allowed to use rhetoric to interfere with dialectic, then we will have a very dysfunctional government.
[–] 2cents4free ago
Sotamoyer makes a valid point yet it seems they recalibrated appropriately.
[–] killkillkill ago
Do we have a link to the actual ban here? I know he did it twice, was it the same one both times? Which countries are on the list and what does it mean as far as them entering?
[–] faggotfaggotfaggot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Trump is continuing a pre-existing law that was originally implemented by obamer. I don't see libtards bitchin when Obama separated families or banned Muslims... Edit spelling