1
-1

[–] Wollodad 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I agree with this ruling. It's only fair to have to pay state tax if brick and mortar stores have to.

0
0

[–] thelma ago 

You don't understand the issue.

0
2

[–] 13093400? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Easy enough in a single state, but now I have to collect tax for 50 different states on every transaction, remit it in a timely manner with the proper paperwork, and ensure I do not run afoul of their laws in order to ensure I don't get sued or have a warrant put out for me for tax fraud. Small businesses will be forced to either stop shipping or start paying a processor to collect and remit for them. Costs just went up quite a bit for some.

0
3

[–] viperguy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

TELEPHONE!

The orders will be finalized by merely calling a telephone number and punching in a transaction code invoice confirmation number.

Good old fashioned telephone purchase.

Then they will try to modify the constitution, AND established case law and practice.... and it will take decades.

0
0

[–] 13093451? ago 

This doesn't just apply to on-line. It applies to any out-of-state retailer, which would include on-line, catalog, and phone. They threw out the previous rulings that were made and applied to catalog and telephone sales and were later expanded to internet sales.

0
0

[–] burns29 ago 

Not for Amazon. Their lobbying has paid off.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] patriot_biz 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You're retarded and policy illiterate. Learn to read nigger.

0
4

[–] undertheshills 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Its levels the playing field for local retailers. It's either a 7% internet sales tax or abolish local sales tax.

0
3

[–] 13090806? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Less taxes. I think the point is one 7% tax and nothing else. Not sure if that’s income or sales.