1
-1

[–] FortniteGenocide 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Because the invasion must continue.

https://streamable.com/q0j8b

0
0

[–] Tazzermalt ago  (edited ago)

because the US may be owned by foreign interests, globalist corps, the Fed alien bankers and owned by enemies with interest not for USA but for Israeli extremists, international commie and owned by Saudi mohammedans... this toxic crap started when Nixon took the Gold way from the Dollar and backed it with Oil to pay for Nam...royal or Euro elites have also made fortunes from the scam.

0
0

[–] boekanier ago 

When whites would do this, it would be 'racism'...

0
0

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI ago 

Nobody wants us to start emulating the way either of those countries do things. Japan is a closer ally than them, use Japan's ploicies as the inspiration for changing our immigration policies

1
0

[–] Trapezoidal 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

America is the biggest Illegal migrant scum on the face of this planet, they invade countries destroy their infrastructure steal their wealth place sanctions and embargoes starve the people to submission assassinations kill squads and the list goes on....then the scum complain about people trying to escape the hell hole they created....this is Americans dumb as fuck its no wounder Jews own them

1
-1

[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

the decline of the USA precedes the destruction of israel. Those european Jews cannot breed fast enough to compete with the indigenous darkies.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Trapezoidal ago 

What are you saying...get that Jewish dick out of your mouth if you want to talk tough ...faggot

0
2

[–] Reverse-Flash 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

because kikes?

0
3

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Or even mexico.

0
4

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Why doesn't the USA adopt immigration policies like that of its closest allies like Saudi Arabia or Israel?

Because that would cut off the supply of democrat voters.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)