[–] Captain_Faggot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
so what you're saying is if i copyright my face, anytime an agency uses it they have to inform and pay me or they're breaking the law?
[–] derram 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
https://tweetsave.com/eff/status/1009365088191569920 :
EFF on Twitter: "BREAKING: The EU JURI committee has passed #Article13. This requires sites to filter all submissions against a database of copyrighted works—creating a #CensorshipMachine that puts thousands of daily activities and millions of Internet users at the mercy of algorithmic filters."
[–] Vic_V 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
People in the US think companies that do business in the EU wont comply, are you crazy? The same reason twitter and facebook censor hate speech, and guess what, it impacts us too because people continue to choose facebook and twitter over sites like voat and 8ch. Then it all becomes normal. Then it comes here. rip internet
Good. The faster US companies comply with EU law, the faster they get challenged in court and the 1st amendment is enforced on the Internet by the SCOTUS.
Can we just expedite and get it over with? Tails we lose, heads we win - so the faster we get the ball rolling the better.
[–] obvious_throwaway1 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I predict advancements in the blockchain (those that exist today and those being developed) will create a decentralized internet 2.0 in the very near future.
[–] silic0n 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This will be coming to US soon and it will be called "neutrality".