0
0

[–] juicedidwtc ago  (edited ago)

Guys, just remember this next time you are a jurror on a case where a white nationalist goodified a couple niggers. Just say, "not guilty." Jury duty is honestly the easiest way you can make a difference.

0
0

[–] lordvain2 ago 

Very corrupt legal system there. It will lead to their undoing.

0
1

[–] xobodox 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Commie Kangaroo Courts!

Also.. F'k the cops that are letting this happen! I cheer now when I see these niggers shooting cops! I wish I could take back the support that I gave PD all of those years.

0
0

[–] juicedidwtc ago 

It took you this long to cheer for niggers killing cops? the only thugs worse than niggers are (((the police)))

0
2

[–] kneo24 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

When the court of law rules that it's okay for commies to openly attack people, the courts are no longer working for the people. Better dead than red.

0
2

[–] kingminos 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

CCing comfortably I will shoot dead any attacker ... whatever the imagined reason for the attack. Make it your business to do the same. When assaulted don't wait; shoot early ... shoot often.

0
1

[–] parko 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Good luck! https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=FH7aTp8DsVI

Guy was menaced by multiple Antifa thugs, brandished gun: found guilty of 10 counts of unlawful use of a weapon, 10 counts of menacing, and 1 count of 2nd degree disorderly conduct.

40 days in the slammer, felony conviction, banned from owning firearms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Strickland_(blogger)

0
0

[–] kingminos ago  (edited ago)

Pad're you do not brandish ... the law does not protect brandishing. Any CC instructor teaches that. If you are attacked: you-as-victim identify a threatening target, draw and fire your weapon till the threat is neutralized. THAT is protected behavior ... in Florida.

0
0

[–] watts2db ago 

I think they do that to enough of us it will end bad for them. Part of what makes them safe from us is that we have shit to lose. Once we are collectively out of fucks to give (felony convictions, loss of jobs/family/home) and our numbers reach critical mass well then things start to get interesting

0
0

[–] Bobtheviolent ago 

Means in Berkley you must only rely on yourself for protection of life and liberty

0
2

[–] totes_magotes 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Fine. Sedition it is.

1
1

[–] Mimar 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

In a heavy liberal area why would you want a Liberal Jury?? Fuck the Jury and just have the judge rule. You can hold the Judge to the fire if he gets political, or makes rulings based on opinion instead of facts. Now-a-days they push and want a jury since it means they can control what the jury sees, hears, and understands. Remove the jury and you remove the way the judge can manipulate the situation.

0
0

[–] juicedidwtc ago 

only the accused can waive the right to a jury tho

0
0

[–] Mimar ago 

Hi, I'm usually the one thats late to the party. The commentary I wrote was an advisory to those in that area. If you read the article, one would come off with the the belief that possibly Jury but for sure the public attending the trail were liberals. At the end of the Article it stated something about a kangaroo court, don't remember since its been a week. But my comment was to those who read it and went wtf was the judge thinking. Now majority of people if ever in court are defending themselves. So my comment was too them. About a way to stop it from happening too them. But yes you are correct only a Defendant accused of a criminal offense(usually) can waive that right. But I highly doubt we have many prosecutors on voat, just saying.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)