0
0

[–] Flour ago 

0
1

[–] dontdoxxmefaggots 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Technically israel (aka Rothschild private camp) had the bomb since the mid 60s

and then

Had the A bomb existed israel would have used it in 1948

also

I am a structural engineer with a master degree in Welding

lmfao. the physics behind nuclear weapons is understood very well. why would you trust the word of a structural engineer and welder? that's like trusting bill nye (mechanical engineer) saying climate change is totally real, gender is on a spectrum, i'm the science guy.

CS melt at 1560

Caesium has a melting point of 28.5 celsius, this guy is actually retarded

0
0

[–] Flour ago  (edited ago)

I am still analyzing the process using the Reciprocal System. One of the more obvious things that stands out is that they used a compression wave to set off nuclear fission. Extreme compression in the RS amounts to placing atoms within unit distance, causing nuclear fusion. That fusion will cause the atoms involved to exceed the "mass limit" (236 amu on Earth--probably why they picked U-235), releasing the isotopic mass (charged neutrinos) first, before destroying the atomic rotations. The neutrinos would add to the isotopic mass of adjacent atoms, forcing them into mass limit detonation. But you would need an enormous quantity of U-235 to keep the process going--it would burn like a wildfire, starting at the center, moving out to the surface, then when it ran out of fuel, would just burn out when it encountered atoms of far less mass that could not be easily pushed over the mass limit boundary. The atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, with a mass of 14--quite a long way from 236! Also, consideration should be given to the thermal motion of the atoms, which increases spatial separation, diffusing energy.

The result of the fusion process would also push the atoms over the unit speed boundary (the speed of light), and the basic properties of FTL motion (as described by Larson in his article on stellar X-ray emitters) is to push linear motion into equivalent space--the thermal motion (heat) would then become a 2nd power function--magnetism (the EMP). In other words, the consequence is basically the same as a sunspot, as described by Nehru. A burst of inverse-temperature and a magnetic pulse, but since the kinetic energy is translating into rotational, equivalent space, there would not be much of a shock wave. That doesn't work too well for the military

https://forum.antiquatis.org/viewtopic.php?t=1589

0
0

[–] ShinyVoater ago 

Sorry, was thinking of something else. But onto something definitely relevant, anything that the heat "merely" melts isn't going to have enough structural integrity to survive the blast.