1
-1

[–] 9-11 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Are you sure They are Implying that An individual Voat user, Would be responsible for the Court and legal fees If voat is Sued?

It says explicitly in the ToS that you (yes you @FuckUredditFuckuSpez) will hold Voat "Harmless" plus you will "Defend", i.e. any red penny that Justin Chastain has to squeeze out of his ass because of a lawyer, court, 3rd party suing, you will cover it... and you defending them means you will cover lawyer fees too.

I dont know specifically of any website that has invoked this, but contracts irl have these sorts of things negotiated to an absurd extent and those do hold up in court (as long as the severance clause holds up).

0
0

[–] FuckUredditFuckuSpez ago 

Dude... Why you gotta do that?? I read your first sentence

"It says explicitly in the ToS that yo"

And Though to myself

Oh Sweet, This dude is gonna clarify this shit for me....

Then a dozen words Later we end up at

. any red penny that Justin Chastain has to squeeze out of his ass

So now we're back to square one... Square one was my suggestion that you misinterpreted the user agreement...

But Square two was Not being confident in MY OWN interpretation... So I thought you Were going to solve this once and for all... But no. Here we are... Back at square one. Or wait... I guess 2. Because I'm still not confident In My interpretation... But you didn't help your interpretation either. :/

We'll get to the bottom of this some day.

1
0

[–] 9-11 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

We'll get to the bottom of this some day

Good luck.