[–] urbanmoving ago
come on man you know what I said as well, its considered that depending on context intent. It varies state to state, not to busrt your bubble but generalizations are fine even though its a complex argument due to a myriad of state and federal definitons.
[–] 12855101? ago
Which is exactly what I stated WAY before you commented that I was wrong. Seriously, look at my comments where I actually explain that state to state varies.
[–] urbanmoving ago
"Child nudity is not necessarily child pornography." I stated I was not in full agreements with the statement as is, with caveats and a more narrow description.