0
0

[–] urbanmoving ago 

0
0

[–] urbanmoving ago 

well you need to brush up on the law...its always been this way, hording pics of naked kids has been prosecuted with intent proven...its a disgusting habit. I provided the link if you happen to be a state that tries some weird "liberal case law" than congrats.

0
0

[–] 12849935? ago  (edited ago)

Read again what I wrote. What I said was, "Child nudity is not necessarily child pornography." You said I was wrong then repeated what I said. So let me write it again in a different way.

Sometimes pics of nude kids IS pr0n. Sometimes pics of nude kids is NOT pr0n.

Does that make it easier for you? I don't need to brush up on anything. I have done enough prosecution and defense on that specific point alone in multiple states I know exactly what I'm talking about. I even explained that point with examples. So either your not understanding what I wrote or... No, you're clearly not understanding what I wrote.

0
0

[–] urbanmoving ago 

come on man you know what I said as well, its considered that depending on context intent. It varies state to state, not to busrt your bubble but generalizations are fine even though its a complex argument due to a myriad of state and federal definitons.