0
0

[–] Are_we__sure ago 

SVU is the TV show. SVD is the unit in the NYPD we are talking about. I've been making that mistake too. A few years after the show debuted the NYPD changed the name.

@honeybee

Google "James Oneil NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.

Google "William Bratton NYPD weiner laptop"... Nothing.

No quotes from either Police Chief of the NYPD around that time in 2016.

These men are not Police Chiefs. There are police commisioners. Chief is a high rank within the NYPD. There are about 15 chiefs. There's about another 15 Deputy Commissioners. Your point still stands because none of this people talked to the press about Weiner's laptop and all the things that were supposed to happen if Hillary wasn't indicted didn't happen either.

Your confusion about who is who is because there's not just a division between federal and local and another division between cops and prosecutors. There's four possible groups here

Local cops --NYPD

Local prosecutors --office of the Manhattan District Attorney or the DA

Federal cops --the FBI

Federal prosecutors --the office of the US Attorney for the Southern District of NY.

The reference to the Office’s General Crimes Unit is to the federal prosecutors, Assistant US Attorneys within the Southern District of NY. SVD is local cops. They are a division within the Detectives Bureau

The NYPD's SVU, is seprate from DOJ Federal Law Enforcement

yes, because they are local.

"General Crimes" are Federal agents.

No. General Crimes are prosectors, assitant US Attorneys not FBI.

did they have the laptop availabe for review while under the control of FBI...according to the ESI agreement through the courts and detailed in the search and seizure warrant, yes.

This is not a yes. It's a maybe. It looks like the warrant would apply, but that is only for the federal case. For the NYPD to use any info they would need their own warrant. And given that the FBI notice Clinton letters on the laptop pretty quickly, they may have kept it only in house. We simply don't know who saw what.

we've been falling back on since Prince and True Pundit released the article

This fake story was in circulation before the True Pundit article. See this video from two days before the True Pundit story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=13&v=-5yAcG4JofU

There was child porn on the computer, the feds admitted it.

Have you ever used skype? Using skype does not equal creating child porn. If this is what you are relying on for you claim, this is not the FBI admitting anything.

I agree, my point was Kim praised SVU and all the preliminary reports stated that SVU was doing an investigation too. So, him giving the head nod corroborates these reports..

Kim praised SVU for help in the federal investigation. He did not corroborate anything about a local investigation. That could be open and active. That could open and dormant. That could be closed due to the federal case ending in a conviction.

The story was the NYPD got the laptop first and was horrified by what they saw and were all ready to indict dozens of people when the FBI swooped in and took the case and the laptop away from them. The NYPD didn't trust the FBI, so they copied the laptop before handing it over. Then they threatened the FBI and James Comey that the truth would come up if he didn't indict Hillary Clinton. That story is dead. Even honeybee sees that.

0
0

[–] youllrememberme [S] ago 

SVU is the TV show. SVD is the unit in the NYPD we are talking about. I've been making that mistake too. A few years after the show debuted the NYPD changed the name.

I didn't make it past honeybee because of this. Why would I read any further when you open up with some nitpicky bullshit like this? You even admit they were called SVU.