0
0

[–] BiscuitFever ago 

Net neutrality is a regulation on the free market. I'll always pay for the best service, and so should everyone else. Verizon has competitors that offer unlimited data and they'll benefit from Verizon's idiocy by absorbing the customer base that wants unlimited data.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] BiscuitFever ago 

That line of reasoning has been tried on us before, it doesn't hold up to scrutiny. The current oligopoly is there because of government regulations, not in spite of them. Net neutrality only helps the current oligopoly, not hurt them. It prevents competitors from competing. Your first sentence is a lie, don't bullshit people who actually know what they're talking about. You don't believe in a free market, you believe in a government controlled market that stifles competition. Your entire argument is predicated on your first premise being true, it isn't.

0
2

[–] 12825819? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I understand the timing, but caps and Net Neutrality are not related. Caps have always been legal and exist for many providers. One of the main reasons I have been with my current provider for so many years is it is the only one available to me that has no data caps at all. The rest have always had one, and usually 300-400 GB at most (although 1 TB is common now).

0
0

[–] Rakosman ago 

When you see "some customers" paired with data caps you know who they're talking about.