[–] NoisyCricket ago
Actually, from column A and column B. He is an evil genius. He also is not the top dog. Soros reports directly to the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds (combined with others) pull the strings. Soros isn't a puppet. He's more like a director with a fair bit of independent latitude in movement and decisions.
[–] Onlio 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Please don't defend him. He is one of the most evil people in history
[–] Oh_Well_ian [S] 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
If you think I just defended him, you have problems, buddy. I'm the O/P on this post and you are demonstrating exactly the mindset I'm warning against.
Of course he is evil, but he could drop dead this minute and another would take his place.
Stop simplifying and personifying the greater pervasive evil that has overtaken mankind.
[–] bopper 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes, besides, FBI anon identified Soros as an ideologue more than anything else, those above him are likely pure reprobate evil (not that Soros is not but Soros might think he's doing good work).
[–] toutedesuite 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is the crux of the problem, which too few have fully understood. All who complain that the swamp must be drained more speedily are naieve or ignorant. Cutting the legs off the hydra — when dozens more can quickly take their place — does nothing but waste precious resources, demoralize the few who are putting everything at risk, and leave undetected and/or intact all the ratholes full of bad actors. We should not mistake carefully plotted, patient, passive defense for a failure to act. Q says trust the plan, and I do, because what is the alternative?
[–] NoBS 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
What if I told you Soros is alive because the CIA is not done with him? Would I also be defending him? Or attacking the CIA with my opinion and educated guesses?