Has the question even been answered whether Israel was actually defending "itself"? ...was it "defending" it's military installations in the Israeli occupied Golan Heights (Syrian Land) which was under attack? ...was it defending against an actual attack on Israel (so incredibly unlikely, unless a retaliation strike against weapons positions that had attacked Iranian positions)?
A Syrian independent journalist analysed the situation well. He's familiar with the different regions in the Golan Heights. Apparently there are some Israeli held, some Syrian held, and a DMZ, or something along those lines. I'm not 100% clear.
[–] alexmark [S] 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
Notice the pattern? De-escalation is only called for when Israel defends herself against Islamic regimes.
[–] fl3x ago
Has the question even been answered whether Israel was actually defending "itself"? ...was it "defending" it's military installations in the Israeli occupied Golan Heights (Syrian Land) which was under attack? ...was it defending against an actual attack on Israel (so incredibly unlikely, unless a retaliation strike against weapons positions that had attacked Iranian positions)?
A Syrian independent journalist analysed the situation well. He's familiar with the different regions in the Golan Heights. Apparently there are some Israeli held, some Syrian held, and a DMZ, or something along those lines. I'm not 100% clear.
[–] Oh_Well_ian 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Who gives a fuck about either...
like choosing sides between the Bloods and Crips
[–] fl3x ago (edited ago)
In the sense that you want them both gone, sure. In the sense that they're both equally matched? You're kidding me. Go team Snackbar! #GlassTheKikes
[–] Lundynne 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Defends itself by launching missiles at a foreign country? Believable
[–] 12724233? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It's almost like they were Iranian targets and even the Syrian reporting says it was almost exclusively foreigners killed