1
-1

[–] VoatisCIA [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Link https ://thegoldwater .com/news/25207-Wikileaks-Dumps-Hillary-Email-Exposing-Her-Ordering-US-Diplomats-to-Steal-DNA-from-UN-Leadership

1
-1

[–] VoatisCIA [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

@think getting 'banned domains ' when posting links?? Couldn't add to post

0
0

[–] think- [M] ago  (edited ago)

Here's an archive of the page you can use, this should work:

http://archive.is/9ju7N

Please edit it into the body of the post. Thx.

(P.S.: Please always add the dash when pinging me: think-, otherwise a chap named 'think' without the dash will get the ping.)

Edit: Going to flair this 'Edit Warning' now. Please add the link to your post within 24 hours. Thanks.

0
0

[–] think- [M] ago 

Please ping @ben_matlock, @EricKaliberhall and @Vindicator when you'll have edited the link in, they'll do the next shifts, so that they can remove the flair.

0
5

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

People forget that State is part of the Intelligence Community (IC). Diplomats are often spies. Not the ambassadors. Most of them are idiots.

1
-1

[–] VoatisCIA [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Link to thegoldwater article Via 4chan board: http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/170715567

The 4chan thread discussing this article is used to link to this post is to include the comments and most importantly the reasons why the DNA is so vital to evil actors- look at what this Anon says: " ...Anonymous (ID: GZhfwdm5) 05/06/18(Sun)19:27:01 No.170718639

170715772 # Intel agencies have a habit of collecting DNA, finger prints and other specific identifiers like, obviously, voice recordings and eye scans. Why? They can be used for hundreds of different things.

If a UN diplomat turns on you and you'd like to switch him out, you could have him framed for a crime. And fingerprints, eyescans, voice recordings, etc can be used to gain access to restricted buildings, rooms, etc, etc.

The better question would be, why on earth wouldn't you collect their DNA?"

0
1

[–] flyingcuttlefish 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

also - people don't realize that only the sec. of state can approve foreign weapons sales.... that fact plays a big part in the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play scandal.

3
-3

[–] Are_we_sure 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago  (edited ago)

This is completely false. Um, do you think the Secretary of State has more power that the President? Do you think only one person signs off on foreign weapons sales? Rex Tillerson can just say let Saudi Arabia buy $700 million of weapons? Anything they want off the lot?

Arm sales are an instrument of US foreign policy and occur according to laws set by Congress. There's an inter-agency process about approving foreign arms sales. Congress must be notified of sales over a certain dollar value and can block these arms sales by passing legislation or pass resolutions condemning the sale. State and DOD handle the details, but the State Department is acting on behalf of the President when they approve a sale.

The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (PM) oversees most government-to-government arms transfers and the commercial export licensing of U.S.-origin defense equipment and technologies, consistent with the Arms Export Control Act, the Conventional Arms Transfer Policy, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, and other statutory authorities and relevant international agreements.

The specific unit that looks into all this is Office of Regional Security and Arms Transfers

The process is first a country must send a formal request.

This request is reviewed by the government....is the country on approved for this type of Sale, etc

Congress has to be notified for big sales. The notification limit is higher for NATO members and close allies. : The submission by the Department of State (on behalf of the President) of a preliminary or informal notification of a prospective major arms sale 20 calendar days before the executive branch takes further formal action.

That arms sale pay to pay is a whole lotta bullshit, it only works if you don't understand the above process and think one person approves US arms sales AND if you cherry pick the evidence.

Ireland gave a big, big donation and its arms sales went down 33% Algeria gave a small donation and its arm sales went up 400% Morocco gave a big donation and its arm sales stayed the same. Brunei gave the same as Algeria and its arms sales plunged 80%

A pay to play scheme would be consistent and if you paid more you should expect bigger payouts. Morocco gave 8 times what Algeria gave. Ireland gave 20 times.

It's almost like the donations to the Clinton Foundation had no effect at all on US foreign policy.

This is the type of deceptive bullshit political actors can get anyway with when people don't understand the details of how something actually works. Most everybody does not know how uranium is licensed or how the CFIUS board works or how arm sales get approved, so they have the complete jump on people and can frame routine actions into a scandal.

0
0

[–] pizza-party-pooper-2 ago 

Hmm, maybe this is a stretch, but sounds like she was trying to clone folks. particularly the part about DNA and "Management decisions"

0
2

[–] carmencita 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

With her there is always an ulterior motive. Just throw out the wildest idea and then research it. Research is always important, not just wild ideas. But yes, what you propose, is a possibility. They certainly have secret places.

0
4

[–] ScannerDarkly 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

DNA would be used to frame people/gain leverage. Not for cloning people, lol.

1
-1

[–] VoatisCIA [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

...Anonymous (ID: GZhfwdm5) 05/06/18(Sun)19:27:01 No.170718639

170715772 # Intel agencies have a habit of collecting DNA, finger prints and other specific identifiers like, obviously, voice recordings and eye scans.

Why? They can be used for hundreds of different things.

If a UN diplomat turns on you and you'd like to switch him out, you could have him framed for a crime. And fingerprints, eyescans, voice recordings, etc can be used to gain access to restricted buildings, rooms, etc, etc.

The better question would be, why on earth wouldn't you collect their DNA?

0
3

[–] DrPenguin 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Hillary Rodham Clinton is quite possibly the most corrupt Secretary of State in American history, and no doubt the most corrupt politician to ever walk the face of the earth.

We're better than this...

0
0

[–] flyingcuttlefish ago 

wait - link to Guardian article ????

link to the e-mail???

any link???

1
-1

[–] YogSoggoth 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Pretty sure you have to make the link connection in your mind. Stare at the goat more.

1
0

[–] VoatisCIA [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Posted the links! All good

0
1

[–] flyingcuttlefish 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

THanks - I need the links to repost the info... https://cfgate.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/dna-and-passwords/

Maybe DNA is also useful for brownstoning ops .... there must be plenty of DNA 'left behind'. Or for Epstein island .... lots of blackmail material if DNA matches kiddies used in ops.

2
-2

[–] Are_we_sure 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

As noted in the three or four other posts about this

This is not a state department policy. It's a National intelligence directive based on the president's executive order.

It's based in the national intellgence priorities set forth by the Director of National Intelligence dating back to 2004 and still in place today.

State Department cables have the Secretary of State's name on them. In this case, the person sending this cable is the acting head of the operations bureau of State's INR, the INtel and Research bureau passing along a presidential directive. A policy like this is often debated at the National Security Council.

0
2

[–] racmo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

bombshell- kudos to you

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)