Re: All those people that were granted immunity from prosecution in the HRC email scandal by the top investigators of the (presumably corrupt) FBI never turned over any (as far as we know) incriminating evidence against Hillary and the DNC.
Question: Is that immunity from prosecution still valid?
Immunity deals are generally given on the basis that the individual has provided a full and transparent account of all events. If it can be demonstrated that someone given immunity lied or was knowingly not fully transparent then they blow their deal.
Also note that the immunity deal given would be specific to that investigation most of which as I understand were given in relation to the HRC server, so crimes outside of that are still fair game.
[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Re: All those people that were granted immunity from prosecution in the HRC email scandal by the top investigators of the (presumably corrupt) FBI never turned over any (as far as we know) incriminating evidence against Hillary and the DNC.
Question: Is that immunity from prosecution still valid?
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'm guessing there is a piece of USC that may invalidate immunity under certain conditions, i.e. treason.
[–] dooob 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Considering how dirty they are, even if the immunity is valid, they have rooms full of skeletons.
[–] LostandFound 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Immunity deals are generally given on the basis that the individual has provided a full and transparent account of all events. If it can be demonstrated that someone given immunity lied or was knowingly not fully transparent then they blow their deal.
Also note that the immunity deal given would be specific to that investigation most of which as I understand were given in relation to the HRC server, so crimes outside of that are still fair game.
[–] GoodGodKirk [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Not if everyone who issued them are fired.
[–] Lordbananafist 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
hahahaha you're a funny guy
[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Seems like it would be a "sticky" legal battle to indict any of them. (Like the mid-level tech that set up her illegal server).