10
6

[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 10 points 6 points (+16|-10) ago  (edited ago)

There is no storm. Don't you remember you were sold that the storm begins when trump gets back from China. Nothing happened. You are moving the goal post back yet again. Arrest are not imminent. The FBI is a tool of the Banking cartel, they protect those doing opperations for them. There is nobody high up in the FBI who is not theirs. The entire government is phony. Stop selling Q.

0
1

[–] Narcissism 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"Stop selling Q" Has Q become a new acronym for BS?

1
3

[–] dooob 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Sleeper account

0
2

[–] Psalm144-1 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

With Q, "arrests" and real "justice" is always just around the corner. Its always "next week" which then turns into "next month" then ultimately turns into some future date months and months out. All these dates come and go and guess what... Podesta, Clinton, Alefantis are still walking free. WHERE ARE THE PERP WALKS?! I can't stand how much blind faith people put in Q. I'm not totally against Q but I CAN'T STAND IT when people say shit like "dont worry Q said x".

All the Q worshipers seem to be in some kind of hypnotic trance. Lingering on the words of a completely anonymous online identity and following orders like good boys and girls. I think its time to drop Q and get back to what we do best, digging and researching on our OWN and busting stories wide open!

0
0

[–] WalnutSauceGoat ago 

Well put.

5
4

[–] dooob 5 points 4 points (+9|-5) ago 

I am glad the shills dont like Q, it only tells me Q is real.

0
9

[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Re: All those people that were granted immunity from prosecution in the HRC email scandal by the top investigators of the (presumably corrupt) FBI never turned over any (as far as we know) incriminating evidence against Hillary and the DNC.

Question: Is that immunity from prosecution still valid?

0
2

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm guessing there is a piece of USC that may invalidate immunity under certain conditions, i.e. treason.

0
4

[–] GoodGodKirk [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Not if everyone who issued them are fired.

3
-3

[–] Lordbananafist 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

hahahaha you're a funny guy

0
1

[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Seems like it would be a "sticky" legal battle to indict any of them. (Like the mid-level tech that set up her illegal server).

0
5

[–] dooob 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Considering how dirty they are, even if the immunity is valid, they have rooms full of skeletons.

0
7

[–] LostandFound 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Immunity deals are generally given on the basis that the individual has provided a full and transparent account of all events. If it can be demonstrated that someone given immunity lied or was knowingly not fully transparent then they blow their deal.

Also note that the immunity deal given would be specific to that investigation most of which as I understand were given in relation to the HRC server, so crimes outside of that are still fair game.