[–]ScannerDarkly0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Acceleration due to gravity is still going to apply the force equally to both parts of the building.
Also the video evidence shows linear acceleration to a steady speed , not freefall acceleration. If there was solid building underneath, it would be impossible for the top portion to accelerate as it went down.
Your insults are meaningless and take away from your argument.
You are still wrong and don’t understand how physics works.
40 floors come crashing down. Does that mass at that acceleration have enough force to crush the one floor below it? Keep asking that all the way down.
[–] ScannerDarkly ago (edited ago)
Acceleration due to gravity is still going to apply the force equally to both parts of the building.
Also the video evidence shows linear acceleration to a steady speed , not freefall acceleration. If there was solid building underneath, it would be impossible for the top portion to accelerate as it went down.
Your insults are meaningless and take away from your argument.
You are still wrong and don’t understand how physics works.
[–] Butterbread ago
You started with the condescension.
40 floors come crashing down. Does that mass at that acceleration have enough force to crush the one floor below it? Keep asking that all the way down.