1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Christopher Puplick is already in trouble taking his first case as a judge: http://www.latrobevalleyexpress.com.au/story/5322129/au-pair-visa-documents-remain-suppressed/?cs=8 https://theaimn.com/the-public-has-a-right-to-know/ sterday, in ruling on a freedom of information application into the circumstances surrounding Peter Dutton’s granting of special work visas to two au pairs who arrived in 2015, former Liberal Senator Chris Puplick ruled that it would be inappropriate to grant the request as it would reveal highly sensitive material about how Australian Border Force operates.

No doubt.

Because, from a couple of recent cases, it seems that Border Force operates on the whim of the Minister.

Recently, we had the case of a grateful father ringing Ray Hadley to express his thanks to Peter Dutton for interceding in the case of a man who was an accomplice to an assault that killed the man’s son.

Unhappy with the judge’s ruling, the father rang Peter Dutton’s office. Dutton, who the father assures us “didn’t know me from a bar of soap”, quickly rang back and, within two hours, the man had been picked up by Border Force for deportation.

How on earth could they possibly have reviewed the case and the reasons behind the judge’s ruling in two hours? On the basis of a phone call from a total stranger, Dutton mobilised Border Force to do his bidding.

In the cases of the au pairs, once again, a simple phone call to Dutton saw him immediately overrule immigration officials to grant a “public interest” visa even though one of the girls was a repeat offender.

Ironically, it was somehow in the public interest to give these “illegal immigrants” visas but not in the public interest to know why. The burning question, and the one Peter Dutton refuses to answer, is who were these girls going to work for. Obviously someone with a direct line to Dutton.

But Puplick feels releasing that information would be invading the girls’ privacy.

Think of the number of times that Dutton has publicly named people who, after investigation, have not been found to have done anything wrong. Think of the delay in processing visas for genuine refugees. Dutton, the overlord, determines who is worthy and who is not.

Interestingly, in 2003, Chris Puplick himself resigned from his position as president of the Anti-Discrimination Board amid allegations that he helped a friend win a payout for anti-gay victimisation at work.

And then we have Michaelia Cash who is claiming “public interest immunity” to avoid revealing her role in tipping off the media about raids on the offices of the AWU in regard to a donation from over a decade ago that was properly declared at the time. Much worse, to my mind, is the blatant misuse of the AFP and the ROC for political purposes, and now tying up the courts trying to cover up her misdeeds.

In both instances, the government is spending a fortune fighting against the public’s right to question if Ministers are misusing their power.

As the Dalai Lama said, “A lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity.”

With this lot in power, we have every reason to feel insecure.

0
1

[–] carmencita 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So Luke McKee is in a US jail still sponsoring his BFs visa so what does that mean? Sponsoring his visa to come here, or is he sponsoring his visa to stay in Australia? I am confused. What do you want us to do in a simple nutshell? I am giving you an upvoat for I understand this guy is a pedophile, that much I know, but after reading it all, I am confused. Thank you for all your reports.

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

no.. i am luke mckee.

The paki @AliRChoundhry on twitter until I mentioned him and he panicked is still in Australia sponsored on a visa of a deported Australian gay marraige activist chlid porn downloader who is sitting in a US jail. The paki must be deported under Australian law unless:

1) People who are deported for child porn (http://twitter.com/slurptea1 Dr Matthew Hynd) in a foreign jail are of good enough character enough to keep his gay boyfriend in the country contrary to section 501 migration act 1958 on a gay partner visa. Garry says in court says gay's can't be pedophiles - so technically it's a PEDO +1 their mate into australia visa.

2) Pakistan mass kills gays like the Greens say and he's a refugee (a country with tranny rights laws) from the evil anti-gay tyrannical nation Pakistan.

If #1 or #2 isn't true - by law the paki pedo partner visa recipient has to go.

0
1

[–] carmencita 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Okay, so I agree, but what can we do about it? Is there anything that can be done at least by us?

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

https://www.theherald.com.au/story/5333670/ranting-former-cab-driver-says-hes-just-a-god-fearing-victim/

If you expose politically rape cover-ups and judges giving the rapists a quarter of a million dollars compo cash you are a ranter!

They don't even say I wrote the article not john sunol about the judge awarding over 50k in money to a the first tranny man who aids raped women in a women's prison as a inmate - because the warden dare told the female inmates unless you want to die from aids don't have sex with this man. How dare the warden tell woman to care about their health and not allow a gay man with aids to have sex with them in a woemn's prison. That's what this judge ruled - and it's wrong to hate that decision that gay men with aids must not be apprehended by a warden from having aids sex with women in prison.

What MSM journalist SUPPORTS RAPE! What a scrag. Let's see if we can get some feminists to denouce her as a rape lover. If she loves rape so much why doesn't she publish her address on the internet?

The full story is here:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2492737

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Video: Today's Surveillance of the PEDOSTATE HQ on way back from Pakistani Embassy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQzooQ4q374

PEDO STATE HQ has no Australian flags on the building. Only rainbow flags. We all know what they stand for now don't we! His Res photos here: https://8ch.net/pol/res/11465925.html#q11472339

On the way back from talking to Pakistan head of consular about the Australian Greens party accusing Pakistan of wholesale killing gays (a country with trans rights bills in reality) whilst supporting the cause of a FBI Infant Sex Child Porn Fugitive Mr Slurp Marriage Equality tea (@slurptea1 on twitter) trying to help his illegal immigrant Pakistani visa over-stayer queue jumper stay in the country where he is today after Immigration ruled downloading child porn means you still are of good enough character under section 501 Migration act 1958 to sponsor your pedo mates into the country.

140,000 Gays signed a petition that Pakistani kills gays and he needs help. See the video that is banned from YouTube of Lee Rhiannon helping pedophiles on the run sue the government and raise crowd funded cash.

I NEED YOUR HELP - EXPOSE THIS & MSM LIES:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2492737 "Man about to be jailed who shared my blog that exposed first transgender who legally used women's toilet (in jail) AIDS raped 4 women and then got compo"

and see the links in the letter below about "Australian Government Immigration Department Formally Rules Gay Marriage Activists who download child porn in USA are of good character" & "Youtube uses anti-child-porn video fingerprinting technology to cover-up Australian Greens Party Leadership praising pedophiles at rally"

First Contact:

My name is Luke McKee.

I am a well known anti-gay-pedophilia activist and UNHCR confirmed political refugee and dissident from Australia.

It has come to my attention that a leader of the Australian Greens Party whilst supporting pedophiles on the run from the FBI for child porn gave a public speech at a protest outside Australian Government Immigration offices in Sydney claiming that Pakistan wholesale kills homosexuals.

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=ONG394816RU2 (video)

Even Wikipedia says that is a lie. Sodomy laws are normally only used against pedophiles - and not enforced. Your country even has transgender rights.

Please read the top story about this saga on the world's #1 anti-pedophilia forum:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2491325

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2489269

(lots of other links about the Pakistani child porn visa saga here - including mainstream news)

http://www.news.com.au/world/australian-scientist-dr-matthew-hynd-sentenced-for-child-porn-offences/news-story/d6d77cd9d23003c42ee3a630af0768f5

Gave visa to this Pakistani national.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e39WNnfU-pMYouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWLGhrDVUdwYouTube

Australian government has ruled you don't have bad a character if you download child porn - because the pedophile above whilst in jail in the USA is still sponsoring his boyfriends visa in Australia right now. Under Australian law you must be of good character to sponsor a migrant into Australia - and visa's are cancelled if immigration is informed otherwise. Immigration blocked my email because the manager was gay - and decided that child porn isn't bad character - as exposed above.

Background on other pro-pedophilia actions the Australian government is taking involving myself, my friends and my family.

https://8ch.net/pol/res/11454429.html#q11454429

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2492737

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2489269/12429289

What am I seeking from Pakistan?

A public statement that you don't kill gays to restore the honor of your country on the international human rights stage contrary to the public statement's by Australian political leaders - and that this homosexual put in Australia near Australian children by the Greens party lobbying and a pedophile singing the sponsorship forms is removed as per the law without any risk to his person as sodomy laws aren't enforced and has no right to stay in Australia as a refugee or on a child pornographer of "good character" sponsored gay partner visa. He never had a right to stay in Australia even before the visa was granted as he was an illegal immigrant over-stayer. Greens used gay rights as a platform to help him queue jump, avoid deportation and a 5 year ban that even non-homosexuals get for breaking the immigration laws before they can marry.

https://www.visaaustralia.com.au/migration-review-tribunal/brisbane-ali-choudhry-deportation/

What you choose to say about Lee Rhiannon of the Australian Greens party is not my decision but I know what I would do. She's already lost the ability to rejoin the next government, and has under investigation for parliamentary expenses fraud. There will be little detriment to international relations condemning her actions in league with pedophiles to attack Pakistan with baseless lies, and to be honest the majority of the Australian voting population will THANK YOU!

Warm Regards,

Luke McKee UNHCR Ref 2010-000092 HK.

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Compare all the current gay and MSM news headlines from http://twitter.com/garryburnsblog and https://www.facebook.com/Garryburnsgayactivist/ from Gay NEWS TO THE TRUTH ON PIZZGATE - IT'S A CRIME TO EXPOSE A MASSIVE AIDS RAPE COVERUP DONE BY THE FIRST TRANNY TO USE A WOMENS TOILET UNDER GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD AND THE LEADER OF THE ADB THAT PROSECUTES JOHN FOR ONLY BEING ASSOCIATED WITH ME AND SHARING A BLOG (I POST ALL WITHOUT HIS APPROVAL) GIVING SPEECHES SAYING PROUD BOYLOVER ROBERT DOLLY DUNN WHO DIED IN LONG BAY JAIL IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AND WAS A VICTIM OF A WITCHHUNT.

WE GOT THE PEDOPHILES IN CHARGE IN AUSTRALIA. AND THE WROTE THE BOOK ON GAY MARRIAGE LITERALLY. THE THREAD IS HERE.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2492737

If you have free speech rights troll this pedophile that prosecutes people for linking to this video AND NO OTHER ACTION

tiny url dot com slash abcplugspedos (crime to link to as confirmed in case law) Why is it wrong to critize baby rapists exposed on this youtube video - then have a judge to say those comments against those in US jails for 40 years for raping russian infants is hate speech because the baby rapists identify as gay before and after their arrest?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHrR9MY6GdM

aka

"abcplugspedos" if you search in www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au

as exposed here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2018442

Poor John Sunol has got three gay marriage activist jew corrupt biased jew judges in a row. Every acronym there is confirmed and provable in court. These people are corrupt as fuck.

Before the latest one Marks, and Janet Newman I brought done Nancy Henessey with my research. Yet she's still in charge after this....

http://bernardgaynor.com.au/ncat-deputy-president-has-questions-to-answer/

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Even the gay news are saying you need to go to jail for exposing LGBTI activists who are pedophiles.

Nobody cares that Garry Burns was court on the SPARKLES the Pony pedo website or caught sending his penis picture to children (I have it). He's a gay hero - he's a gay man he says - the prerequisite to lodge and ADB complaint. But he says gay men doesn't fuck kids when he does.

If Garry gets arrested you see for being a pedophile all the gay pride homosexual vilification case law goes out the window - so he knows he can fuck kids and get away with it! THE GAY POWER TO RAPE KIDS! YAY!

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2029702

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

How privacy nanny nixed TV series

By Richard Ackland May 9 2003

The sudden departure of the NSW bureaucrat Chris Puplick won't bring on a flood of tears among members of the journalistic trade. As Privacy Commissioner and president of the Anti-Discrimination Board he was a state licensed busybody, who stuck his nose into all manner of enterprises that complainants regarded as being discriminatory and public.

Paul Sheehan has already ticked him off in these pages for his nannyesque report on "Race for the Headlines", which among other things complained that the media's coverage of the attacks by gang rapists in Sydney "racialised" the attackers. The Premier, Bob Carr, told Parliament on May 1 that in his view Puplick's report was "ideological claptrap".

A day later there was a leak of an unfortunate episode which revealed that Puplick assisted a friend called "Bunny" in a gay victimisation complaint that was investigated by the Anti-Discrimination Board, over which he presided.

The next day Puplick resigned from both jobs and now the Ombudsman is investigating the Bunny affair "as well as other matters".

However, there is one story with Puplick in a starring role that has not been told and which reveals quite potently the tensions surrounding the protection of privacy and the media's pursuit of informative and interesting material.

Deborah Cornwall, a former Channel Nine legal affairs reporter, had been discussing with Beyond Productions a 13-part TV series shot in the local courts in and around Sydney. The planning had been going on since February last year.

It was described as an "observational documentary series" that would give the public "an unprecedented insight" into the workings of the Local Court. It was to be called City Court and the pitch said it would be produced along lines similar to the RPA series.

The whole point of the exercise was to capture some of the reality of the criminal justice system, with real accused persons, real prosecutors, real magistrates, real witnesses, the role of legal aid lawyers, the granting of bail, the bargaining with prosecutors - in other words the progress of cases both inside and outside court.

To that end lengthy deliberations took place between the producers and the Attorney-General's Department, the Department of Corrective Services, the Police Service, the Law Society of NSW and the Chief Magistrate. From this emerged a set of protocols that was designed to protect all the parties. The key to it was that "featured persons" would have to provide their consent before being filmed.

A deed of access between the director-general of the NSW Attorney General's Department, Laurie Glanfield, and Beyond Productions was prepared. The venture looked set to proceed but Glanfield thought he had better seek the advice of Puplick as Privacy Commissioner.

Puplick exploded with a 10-page objection: "Given the very obvious and serious privacy issues raised by the proposal, I am dismayed that I have not been asked, as Privacy Commissioner, to comment upon the proposal prior to your recent request. I have the most detailed and profound objections to numerous aspects of this project which, if it proceeds in its current form, will be against my most trenchant opposition." Some of the objections were sound and Beyond did its best to address them in subsequent negotiations.

Puplick said that courts were an artificial environment where people experienced emotional distress and so would be unlikely to be able to provide informed consent to being filmed. The 24-hour period in which consent could be revoked was insufficient. He objected to the whole genre of "reality" television because documentaries are shaped by the biases of the producers and editors. The use of signs around the court that filming by a TV crew was in progress was inadequate. "There is no provision for the signs to be in languages other than English, nor any explanation as to how a person with a visual or intellectual disability or a child might be advised of their right not to be filmed," Puplick complained.

A proposed panel with representatives from various agencies and departments should have power to veto the use of footage which in the panel's opinion is prejudicial to the interests of anyone whose identity is apparent, he said.

On and on he went. While many modifications and safeguards were made, it could still not pass muster and eventually the Attorney-General's Department withdrew its support for the series.

The project was dead. No TV court actuality program for NSW. A great pity really, but that's privacy nannies for you.

justinian@lawpress.com.au

1
-1

[–] hojuruku [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Here's my comment on these new thought crime laws coming to California and America too that was downvoted by a LGBTI who is pro rape and pro child porn.

TRUST ME READ MY THREADS FROM AUSTRALIA - THEY PROSECUTE PEOPLE IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES (MY DAD) AND IN DIFFERENT STATES (BERNARD GAYNOR). THIS AFFECTS YOU - ALL OF YOU IN AMERICA - NOT JUST THOSE IN DEMOCRAT GULAG STAETES WHERE IT'S LEGAL FOR POOR WOMEN ON FOOD STAMPS TO PIMP THEMSELVES OUT FOR THE FOREIGN GAY ELITE TO BREED FOR http://twitter.com/gaydads surrogacy business who gets his son to say only men who do anal sex make the best dads and I'm glad I don't have a mother.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vypRbw-kuSAYouTube

http://bernardgaynor.com.au/freedom-australia-just-taken-another-hit/

http://bernardgaynor.com.au/queenslanders-new-south-wales-watching/

http://bernardgaynor.com.au/anti-discriminating-away-freedom-and-democracy/

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2018442

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2492737

AND THEN THEY JAIL YOU FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR YEARS FOR TELLING THESE THOUGHT CRIME TRIBUNALS TO TO GET FUCKED.

And court confirmed pedophiles end up using them - even satanic pedo cults!

https://8ch.net/pol/res/11454429.html

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2029702

Letter to Russian Embassy in NZ about my father loosing house in NZ under trans-tasman procedure act 2010 put in by Rainbow Labor for the crime of disrespecting Gay marriage activists who sodomized Russian babies on NZ soil whilst on holiday in Vietnam....

https://pastebin.com/fv9zeWAc

NB: Sodom Documentary on Russia insider youtube channel with 450k views even censored from archive.org linked to in the post above. It's a must see.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)