0
0

[–] Morbo ago 

I have plenty of electronic test equipment that can measure RF/EMF output and tell me the frequency, relative power and even point me to the general direction of the source. I know plenty about RF/EMF and I do know what will radiate it and what won't. My microwave oven example said "harm you" which means it has enough energy output caught as a standing wave to cause the water molecules in your body to resonate and produce heat by friction. The difference between the sun as an output and man-made RF/EMF sources is the volume of space the sun's output covers. The inverse square law still applies, however, the sun's output is less like a point source and more like an infinite number of point sources aimed at the disc of the Earth exposed to it. The fall-off is minuscule at scales of meters or even kilometers. You would need enough distance between measurement points such that the curve of the Earth provides enough additional distance to have another order of magnitude of drop-off in power. The sun's light will be equally bright on a spot of an open field on a cloudless day as it will 100 meters down the same field. This is a good thing or else solar farms would be really fucking useless. The EMF energy from the sun would match the same fall-off as the visible light so you have a much broader area of field strength with no discernible fall-off over distance on the surface of the planet unless you use areas over hundreds of kilometers. If Alex Jones' claim of low energy EMF being able to kill humans, well then the sun would have already done that from the near constant exposure. You're ignorance and arrogance is showing here. Perhaps you should stop drinking the water. It might be turning you gay and stupid.

0
0

[–] HAESisalie ago 

That is a whole lot of empty talk to try to avoid acknowledging or even understanding that despite the fact the SUN puts out EMF in the magnitude of millions more than your microwave, but the time it reaches the Earth it has been dissipated to almost completely negligible when measured, but your microwave will measure at high levels from within a foot of it, and also drop off to negligible once you move a few feet away from it. This isn't theory where if you use some BS you can spin your way through it. EMF/RF can be measured and quantified. So at this point i assume you just want to remain ignorant or have some vested interest in spread lies about EMF exposure from the sun (low) vs man made sources (High).

0
0

[–] Morbo ago 

Go stare at the sun and tell me how much that visible EMF energy dissipated by the time it burns out your eyes. Light is EMF and there's enough of it hitting the Earth that it fucking lights up half the fucking planet. The amount of energy a solar plant can produce is proof that this is no paltry amount of energy. LMGTFY.

At the upper reaches of our atmosphere, the energy density of solar radiation is approximately 1,368 W/m2 (watts per square meter). At the Earth's surface, the energy density is reduced to approximately 1,000 W/m2 for a surface perpendicular to the Sun's rays at sea level on a clear day. - Source

1,000 W/m2. Fucking unreal. Now of course you're going to bring up the "for a surface perpendicular to the Sun's rays at sea level on a clear day" part as an argument. Well explain then how PV solar plants can generate huge amounts of power when they aren't located in that 1 m2 patch of land/water at the equator that is perfectly perpendicular to the sun's rays? The fall-off is not a big deal since the sun is not a point source radiator. What say you now?