[–] aaronC 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Hogg is a really shitty person for exploiting the shooting to launch his celebrity and political career. The fact that he's jumped to another issue before his 5 minutes of fame were up is proof he's only doing all of this for the fame.
And the worst part is, the DNC is there encouraging him to exploit this tragedy. They are all such pieces of shit, it's not even funny.
[–] derrick81787 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
And the worst part is, the DNC is there encouraging him to exploit this tragedy. They are all such pieces of shit, it's not even funny.
The silver lining is that anyone with half a brain can see what's happening. Sure, that doesn't cover everyone, but enough independents will see through this that it will end up hurting Democrats more than helping. They always over play their hands, sort of how they just knew that Hillary was a sure thing. They live in big liberal cities, and their polls only poll people from liberal locations. That helps them when it comes to publishing fake statistics to support their viewpoints, but they've done it for so long that they are starting to believe their own stats which is causing them to over play their hands.
[–] qotile 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Did you ever wonder why the Jews are such great proponents of democracy? Whether in Indonesia or Pakistan or Serbia or you name it, whenever there is some threat to universal suffrage, the Jews are ready to send the U.S. armed forces in to bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to vote. Why is that? Why can't the Indonesians have an Islamic theocracy if they want? Why can't the Pakistanis have a military dictatorship? Why can't the Serbs run their own country the way they prefer? What is the appeal in making sure that people whose minds have been wasted by Alzheimer's Disease vote? Well, let's not beat around the bush: the appeal of mass democracy lies in the fact that in essentially every country in the world today, the number of persons unable to think for themselves is substantially larger than the number able to make independent decisions. Those unable to think for themselves have their thinking done for them by the people who control the mass media. Which is to say, democracy is the preferred system because it gives the political power to those who own or control the mass media and at the same time allows them to remain behind the scenes and evade responsibility for the way in which they use that power. And the more inclusive the democracy is -- that is, the more Alzheimer's sufferers and Mongoloid cretinsand paranoid schizophrenics and people who live in empty packing cases in alley ways and Jamaican immigrants and football fans are able to vote -- the more certain is the grip of the media masters on the political process. Those voters who buy astrology magazines at the checkout stand and spend their time watching soap operas, game shows, and Oprah absorb their general attitudes on things through the television screen. They learn which ideas are fashionable and which are not by noticing the facial expression and tone of voice of Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather when the news is announced each day. Their opinions on specific issues are formed as they view televised sidewalk surveys taken by reporters. The only uncertainty about these people is whether or not they'll be able to pryt hemselves loose from their couches long enough to vote for the designated candidates. That's why it's important to have lots of them. And wherever there are lots of them, the men who control the mass media also will control the outcome of elections.
[–] aria_taint 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
I think someone needs to put an abrupt halt to him before he really starts going with the help of Soros funds.