0
42

[–] badruns 0 points 42 points (+42|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Do you think she masturbates to the thought of being demolished by him again?

0
21

[–] WD_Pelley 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Yes.

3
6

[–] Spaceballs-1 3 points 6 points (+9|-3) ago 

6
7

[–] Super_Cooper 6 points 7 points (+13|-6) ago 

This is funny, but porn is degenerate and a weapon the Jews use to demoralize our people.

0
7

[–] prairie 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"Oh, Jordan, offend me again! Exercise free speech all over!"

0
2

[–] Hmmm 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Absolutely. No doubt about that.

0
35

[–] big_fat_dangus 0 points 35 points (+35|-0) ago 

This is the equivalent of a February 13 desperate letter to an ex.

11
-10

0
8

[–] MingMing 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

More like February 15th. She already got challenged and lost badly. I would propose a rematch but what's the point.

0
1

[–] 1moar 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nailed it quite succinctly, spot on. Thanks for taking the wind out of my sails. :)

0
26

[–] scoopadoop 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

Is she still salty at him?

0
20

[–] Broc_Lia [S] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago  (edited ago)

1
-1

[–] weezkitty 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

WTF is that?

0
3

[–] Fragnostus 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

salty and butthurt

1
19

[–] Mind_Games 1 point 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

Topics on conservatives are nothing more than ad hominem wrapped up in a leading question. Always.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
15

[–] q_uber 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

we're so far down the rabbit hole such terms are losing all meaning

0
5

[–] CarpetDime 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Classical liberal.

0
2

[–] analfaveto 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Classical liberal is conservative. You know, freedom of speech and all that.

0
1

[–] 12274625? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

He's Canadian, he's probably very liberal by U.S. standards.

0
9

[–] OmniUnderTheBus 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I loved how Scott Dilbert describes her cognitive dissonance as so strong that she is 'hallucinating'

0
0

[–] HuginnOgMuninn ago 

That's just an accurate description.

0
8

[–] KoKansei 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Rage isn't a good look for you, Jordan

Sincerely,

The world's most famous animus-possessed thundercunt

0
1

[–] CarpetDime 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ideas have people

0
6

[–] Sublimesati 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Rage? Why wouldn't she talk that shit to his face the first time around. This is her redemption plan? Yikes.

0
2

[–] Broc_Lia [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

She didn't actually write that, but it sure looks like she's agreeing with it.

0
0

[–] Sublimesati ago 

Sorry, don't have twitter so I'm dumb like that.

0
4

[–] uvulectomy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

All the old and trite "not a good look" argument. Every single time, it can be read as "I don't like what this person is saying, but I have no valid points of my own to counter with, so I'm just going to call them a meanie, but in an "intellectual" sounding way so people will think I'm smrt"

load more comments ▼ (21 remaining)