[–] Potato_McGingerbeard 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Why admit defeat and adjust your beliefs accordingly, when you can just keep shifting the goal posts and throw handfuls of shit from a relatively safe distance?
She's got owners to please and a narrative to protect. Now she knows she can't debate him without looking like a blithering idiot, so she doubles down on the standard marxist character attack.
The irony of trying to paint him as a rage filled hypocrite who can't handle being challenged is palpable.
[–] ADaniels 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It’s just like Hitler said in mein kampf, when he was talking about how he would sit down and talk with communists, and they would agree with him, but the very next day they would be out in the streets as if the conversation had never occurred....... :(
[–] JohnGoodman 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Isn’t that the dumb bitch who interviewed him and pretty much got owned?
[–] uvulectomy 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
All the old and trite "not a good look" argument. Every single time, it can be read as "I don't like what this person is saying, but I have no valid points of my own to counter with, so I'm just going to call them a meanie, but in an "intellectual" sounding way so people will think I'm smrt"
[–] Sublimesati 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Rage? Why wouldn't she talk that shit to his face the first time around. This is her redemption plan? Yikes.
[–] con77 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
libtards are delusional