[–] i_scream_trucks 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There's no choice there unless you're some kind of retarded degenerate pillow biter
[–] lord_nougat 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Judging by this pictorial evidence, I think she looks better with her purse strap over her left shoulder.
[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
She just has that look about her.
[–] i_scream_trucks 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Absolutely. So the question is... why is she not a convicted pedophile.
[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Yes. She describes sexually abusing her younger sister in one of her books.
[–] Runaway-White-Slave 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That's funny, I'm actually browsing voat in my overalls, mine are much nicer and lengthier though. That and I'm a slender/fit guy, who all fatties seem to want to get friendly with already, which means a good number of slender/fit females have interest. It's really a no-brainer, even if the sister rapist weren't a pig, she looks like a dog, a jew-dog, a bitch even, an ugly jew-bitch. That goofy tattoo doesn't help, and even with the rough edge's on Taylor's skirt type thing, it looks less trashy/trailer-park/ghetto, Taylor's shoes also look better.........
These two aren't even in the same category, one's a dirty-jew-sister-raping-bitch, and the other is a pop-star.