0
11

[–] Rabidfish88 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Being a SJW means throwing all logic and rationale out the window.

0
9

[–] Asinthe 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Genger is a social construct. And a spectrum. And its made up. But if you were born the wrong gender you need hormones, because there is no biological differences between 1000 of made up genders that totally exist but yet there are no 2 significant (genders) that you can describe, because they are all the same.

Did i get it right?

0
5

[–] Pulverizor 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I feel like you did so that's important.

0
7

[–] ZeroXVX 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

It's the undeniable truth that trannies cannot deny. If gender is a social construct then how does one know what they are before being told what a girl or boy is? This make believe shit has gone on for too long and young children are now pressured into becoming a freakshow because it's the new fad among liberal communities.

0
7

[–] wigson [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

His guest stumbles through a response then says, "Why are we talking about this again?" Triggered.

I haven't seen someone make that point before. Feminism and SJW identity politics are so fucking flawed and inconsistent. Feelings over facts.

0
7

[–] BillBugle 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

her defence is even worse

"I don't believe men and women are that different" goes against what I imagine has to be something crazy like 98% of all species of life on this planet, and ignores huge sections of even the most basic of biology textbooks.

0
6

[–] ammd 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Even better is when he says that transgender "women" want to behave femininely yet feminists hate femininity. I love when people bring a wrecking ball of logic to the SJW narrative. She had no retort, she was just like a deer in the headlights: "what...? why are we talking about this again?"

0
6

[–] blahblahgafsucks 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Don't worry. Slate, Salon, Vice, HuffPo, etc., will catch wind of this and have exhaustive snarky, condescending articles explaining this embarrassing snafu away by next week.

0
3

[–] ThisIsWhoWeR 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Sneak peak: "Steven Crowder is a literal Nazi!"

0
0

[–] 2plus2equals5 ago 

"No, Steven Crowder didn't actually demolish the transgender debate"

0
4

[–] ClownWorld202 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The perennial problem of all debates involving sociological explanation is that certain people are impervious to cognitive dissonance. Lying is simply easier to justify because it doesn't hurt.

0
2

[–] derram 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=C6nFdvnFpFc :

DEBATE: Feminist Asks Crowder to Check Privilege (Maria Del Russo Uncut) | Louder With Crowder - YouTube


This has been an automated message.

0
1

[–] frogeater 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"Why should someone have to use your pronouns?" "It's my gender" "What is gender" "It's a social construct" "So you literally admit it's made up by people and not nature yet you're forcing me to use it"