0
1

[–] 12061722? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No muslims, no black people, no jews

95% of all conflict is directly or indirectly attributable to these groups

0
0

[–] SteelKidney ago 

Not invite anyone else.

0
1

[–] csicskageci 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Monarchy FTW

0
1

[–] k_digi 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I know this is "just for fun" day dreaming but i've been experimenting with fixing a water tank today and i'm bored:


  • Unless you are issuing your own 'money' (currency) then you are not a 'Nation' and can re title the question "if you were to build a new housing estate ......" etc.

  • upon the realization that to be a 'nation' you need to issue your own energy token, you will realize you have a new immediate set of 'problems'

  • the first will relate to how the currency is issued , next is who issues , and other parameters that are related to the mechanics of that.

  • you may not understand that 'production' is just human energy to have a 'close to' energy neutral system then you will need to issue a 'close to' energy neutral token.

  • all other issues would follow on from that, but they are not trivial and have to do with of course basic resources. Water, - ability to gain other staples.

this is probably before you get to the issue of 'citizenship' - 'welfare' issues would be related to the sum of human energy in your 'nation' utilizing the token you have issued.


Summary

The solution is probably 'no nation' as 'technology' advances there could be means to have multiple separate individuals 'trading' and utilizing a close to energy neutral token.

Each individual would be responsible for their own utilization of 'land and basic resources' however every other 'citizen' if they have faith in the energy neutral token would know that they are yielding the most efficient possible 'value' for their human energy / resources.

have fun.

0
1

[–] 12072812? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Where you been, man? Non-nations have been able to issue their own money for months now.

0
1

[–] k_digi 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

i've been basically alone in froopyland.

i'm sorry i didn't catch up i don't read the large formate newspapers anymore, the ink gets everywhere and i can't move the pages to get all the quality journalism out.

0
0

[–] SOULESS ago 

Honestly... I can't think of a way to keep a culture from changing unless you were constantly removing portions of the population who had conflicting views and beliefs with your ideal society.

But that's closer to a dictatorship if you take away the right to be stupid/free speech.

0
1

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you remove the right to be stupid, then a dictatorship would probably be unnecessary.

0
0

[–] 12056404? ago 

You would write a document like the US Constitution, which lays out exactly what the government is allowed to do. You’d set it up so that the cities couldn’t overrule the countryside. You’d put your rights in writing. And it would get shit all over anyway, because that’s what people are like.

0
0

[–] sweatingbullets ago 

no niggers, mandatory open carry and meet minimum income requirements. Commit a crime, you're out. No second chance, no jail. Gone, period. A constitution set in stone, with no room for "interpretation", what is says it what it means. It will be complete and precise, no amendments necessary. No political parties. Mandatory voting in every election and on every bill by the entire population. Citizen legislators, 2 term limit. When elected, you get 3-6 year leave from your job, compensated by the state at your average yearly salary.

0
0

[–] newoldwave ago 

No niggers

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)