0
0

[–] CrustyBeaver52 ago 

Intentional interference with contractual relations

At common law, a defendant is liable to pay damages in tort for actions intended to interfere with the plaintiff's contractual relations with a third party.

In an intentional interference claim, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the elements of the claim rather than on the defendant to prove that its acts were justified. To prevail on the claim, plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) that a valid contract existed, (2) that defendant had knowledge of the contract, (3) that defendant acted intentionally and improperly, and (4) that plaintiff was injured by the defendant’s actions.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/intentional_interference_with_contractual_relations

0
0

[–] Cat-hax ago 

wait that dosnt make sense tho, i thought they supported fellow niggers, oh thats right its BLM and antifags it dosnt have to make sense.

0
0

[–] midnightblue1335 ago 

This is the first thing BLM/antifa has done that I somewhat approve of. If only all of us niggerfaggots had the time and lack of responsibility to hit the streets and force change, we'd be unstoppable.

But I've gotta be at work in the morning. Fuck.

0
1

[–] shawnfromnh69 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Just drive the train, either the chains will break or their arm will get ripped off but either way we win.

0
1

[–] freedumbz 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago