[–] Mr_NoSkill 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
Never thought of it that way but its a very accurate statement. Didn't Lincoln want to send them back?
[–] cattarhero 0 points 24 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of Lincoln, but he did want to send them back. If he had lived, we might be living in a totally different country. Also, while he was brutal in his war on the South, I believe that the Souths' "reconstruction" would not have been so brutal, if he had lived.
[–] EdSnowden 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago (edited ago)
”Anything that argues me into his idea of perfect social and political equality with the negro is but a specious and fantastic arrangement of words, by which a man can prove a horse-chestnut to be a chestnut horse. I will say here, while upon this subject, that I have no purpose directly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and the black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgment, will probably for ever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality; and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.”
-Abraham Lincoln
[–] Bullinamarket_ ago
And since America is a heavily influential country I'm sure the rest of the world would be very different today as well.
[–] weWusKANGZ 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The problem, as I see it, is who's going to take these pathetic niggers? The USA and Canada won't take WHITE South African people trying to emigrate. The whole world knows what POS American niggers are. I doubt even Africa would want 35 million American niggers. Who would?
[–] fusir 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
Lesson: It's not worth enslaving people. If you have respect for people's free will things tend to go better, as long as they don't violate the NAP.
Edit: Another example, giving welfare to migrants violates the NAP. Dumb shit tends to not happen when it hasn't been violated.
[–] Derpfroot 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
civilizations in the past practiced slavery to their benefit.
Like the Asians who took slaves from around that time. If a nog went to the east, he was castrated. So you got work out of it and then it died. No muss, no fuss. Wish the US did that.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] CobraStallone 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Re-instating segregation would be nice. It was better for niggers too, there's statistics out there, but basically it makes sense to have say an 85 IQ cab driver for an 85 IQ customer, so they fared better job security-wise and so on back when they had their own businesses rather than when forcibly integrated into White ones.
[–] jigaboojams 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is something we can't blame on the Jews.
What about whites enslaving whites? Or rather, what if people faced certain death for some reason and there was so much competition of who might be saved by the masters, who are genetically equivalent, that the would be slaves offered themselves, their possessions, and their descendants up willingly, that they might come under the eternal watchful eye of those who have wherewith to save them. Then would slavery be alright? The master would be all like, well, I don't really agree with slavery in general, but you're very persuasive and you run a hard bargain. Ok, ok, you can be my slave. Come along now. :-)
[–] i_scream_trucks 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I think they call that Sonderkommando
[–] 11807487? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
In the most general terms, something like this happened in the Middle Ages in Europe. However, they weren't slaves they were serfs. They and their descendants were pledged to be attached to the land, not owned by a specific person. There was a whole ceremony where people would renounce their freedom. The biggest holders of serfs were probably monasteries in many cases.
Serfs did have rights and could, for example, inherit. And often their overlords made sure their rights were respected, in part because Christianity created an atmosphere where the rich were expected to look after the poor (a type of eeeevil paternalism). Also because of the Christian take care of your brother thing, if you were rich enough to and didn't, all the other nobles would look at you askance and talk shit behind your back.
No one will talk about different forms of bondage anymore but history classes should really be teaching this stuff in more detail. Once you understand these social strata and forms of labor, everything else about the society starts to make more sense. The only thing they're allowed to say, even at the university undergraduate level, is that African plantation slavery was the worst and most horrifying slavery system ever devised. Which is not even remotely true, the Spartans among other groups treated slaves extremely brutally. But no one can damage the myth.
[–] everef 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago
If white America in the coming decades becomes truly aware at a personal level of the severe consequences of losing its dominance over the country, and realizes that survival of its children is at stake, there is hope that it will defend itself.
Then we will be rid of the niggers, mestizos, and camel fucking Arabs. But more importantly the Jews.
[–] Allan_the_Great 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
This is the most important thing to understand. When you control 100% of the mainstream information, you control all of the sheep who do no investigation of their own (95% of the population)
[–] MyNameIsMud 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago
It's not forever if we don't want it to be.